Hi Ben,
Thanks for a patch update. According to my calculations, this is a v5, not
a v3. And please follow the subject line convention like
[PATCH V5 4/6] subject text follows
and use the same version in all patches of a series - this simplifies
their handling. You can use something like
--subject-prefix="PATCH V6"
for your git format-patch to automate this.
On Sat, 5 Jul 2014, Ben Dooks wrote:
> Add initial support for OF based soc-camera devices that may be used
> by any of the soc-camera drivers. The driver itself will need converting
> to use OF.
>
> These changes allow the soc-camera driver to do the connecting of any
> async capable v4l2 device to the soc-camera driver. This has currently
> been tested on the Renesas Lager board.
>
> It currently only supports one input device per driver as this seems
> to be the standard connection for these devices.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ben Dooks <ben.do...@codethink.co.uk>
> ---
>
> Fixes since v1:
> - Fix i2c mclk name compatible with other drivers
> - Ensure of_node is put after use
> Fixes since v2:
> - Updated freeing of dyn-pdev as requested
> - Coding style fixes
> - Allocate initial resources in one go
> ---
> drivers/media/platform/soc_camera/soc_camera.c | 123
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> 1 file changed, 122 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/media/platform/soc_camera/soc_camera.c
> b/drivers/media/platform/soc_camera/soc_camera.c
> index 7fec8cd..e25fc8e 100644
> --- a/drivers/media/platform/soc_camera/soc_camera.c
> +++ b/drivers/media/platform/soc_camera/soc_camera.c
> @@ -36,6 +36,7 @@
> #include <media/v4l2-common.h>
> #include <media/v4l2-ioctl.h>
> #include <media/v4l2-dev.h>
> +#include <media/v4l2-of.h>
> #include <media/videobuf-core.h>
> #include <media/videobuf2-core.h>
>
> @@ -1581,6 +1582,124 @@ static void scan_async_host(struct soc_camera_host
> *ici)
> #define scan_async_host(ici) do {} while (0)
> #endif
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_OF
> +
> +struct soc_of_info {
> + struct soc_camera_async_subdev sasd;
> + struct v4l2_async_subdev *subdevs[2];
> +};
Yes, this is a right direction, however, why do you use an array of 2
subdev pointers? You only seem to be using one of them?
> +
> +static int soc_of_bind(struct soc_camera_host *ici,
> + struct device_node *ep,
> + struct device_node *remote)
> +{
> + struct soc_camera_device *icd;
> + struct soc_camera_desc sdesc = {.host_desc.bus_id = ici->nr,};
> + struct soc_camera_async_client *sasc;
> + struct soc_of_info *info;
> + struct i2c_client *client;
> + char clk_name[V4L2_SUBDEV_NAME_SIZE];
> + int ret;
> +
> + /* allocate a new subdev and add match info to it */
> + info = devm_kzalloc(ici->v4l2_dev.dev, sizeof(struct soc_of_info),
> + GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!info)
> + return -ENOMEM;
> +
> + info->sasd.asd.match.of.node = remote;
> + info->sasd.asd.match_type = V4L2_ASYNC_MATCH_OF;
> + info->subdevs[0] = &info->sasd.asd;
> +
> + /* Or shall this be managed by the soc-camera device? */
> + sasc = devm_kzalloc(ici->v4l2_dev.dev, sizeof(*sasc), GFP_KERNEL);
Why not also add struct soc_camera_async_client to struct soc_of_info?
Thanks
Guennadi
> + if (!sasc)
> + return -ENOMEM;
> +
> + /* HACK: just need a != NULL */
> + sdesc.host_desc.board_info = ERR_PTR(-ENODATA);
> +
> + ret = soc_camera_dyn_pdev(&sdesc, sasc);
> + if (ret < 0)
> + goto eallocpdev;
> +
> + sasc->sensor = &info->sasd.asd;
> +
> + icd = soc_camera_add_pdev(sasc);
> + if (!icd) {
> + ret = -ENOMEM;
> + goto eaddpdev;
> + }
> +
> + sasc->notifier.subdevs = info->subdevs;
> + sasc->notifier.num_subdevs = 1;
> + sasc->notifier.bound = soc_camera_async_bound;
> + sasc->notifier.unbind = soc_camera_async_unbind;
> + sasc->notifier.complete = soc_camera_async_complete;
> +
> + icd->sasc = sasc;
> + icd->parent = ici->v4l2_dev.dev;
> +
> + client = of_find_i2c_device_by_node(remote);
> +
> + if (client)
> + snprintf(clk_name, sizeof(clk_name), "%d-%04x",
> + client->adapter->nr, client->addr);
> + else
> + snprintf(clk_name, sizeof(clk_name), "of-%s",
> + of_node_full_name(remote));
> +
> + icd->clk = v4l2_clk_register(&soc_camera_clk_ops, clk_name, "mclk",
> icd);
> + if (IS_ERR(icd->clk)) {
> + ret = PTR_ERR(icd->clk);
> + goto eclkreg;
> + }
> +
> + ret = v4l2_async_notifier_register(&ici->v4l2_dev, &sasc->notifier);
> + if (!ret)
> + return 0;
> +eclkreg:
> + icd->clk = NULL;
> + platform_device_del(sasc->pdev);
> +eaddpdev:
> + platform_device_put(sasc->pdev);
> +eallocpdev:
> + devm_kfree(ici->v4l2_dev.dev, sasc);
> + dev_err(ici->v4l2_dev.dev, "group probe failed: %d\n", ret);
> +
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
> +static void scan_of_host(struct soc_camera_host *ici)
> +{
> + struct device_node *np = ici->v4l2_dev.dev->of_node;
> + struct device_node *epn = NULL;
> + struct device_node *ren;
> +
> + while (true) {
> + epn = of_graph_get_next_endpoint(np, epn);
> + if (!epn)
> + break;
> +
> + ren = of_graph_get_remote_port(epn);
> + if (!ren) {
> + pr_info("%s: no remote for %s\n",
> + __func__, of_node_full_name(epn));
> + continue;
> + }
> +
> + /* so we now have a remote node to connect */
> + soc_of_bind(ici, epn, ren->parent);
> +
> + of_node_put(epn);
> + of_node_put(ren);
> + }
> +}
> +
> +#else
> +static inline void scan_of_host(struct soc_camera_host *ici) { }
> +#endif
> +
> /* Called during host-driver probe */
> static int soc_camera_probe(struct soc_camera_host *ici,
> struct soc_camera_device *icd)
> @@ -1832,7 +1951,9 @@ int soc_camera_host_register(struct soc_camera_host
> *ici)
> mutex_init(&ici->host_lock);
> mutex_init(&ici->clk_lock);
>
> - if (ici->asd_sizes)
> + if (ici->v4l2_dev.dev->of_node)
> + scan_of_host(ici);
> + else if (ici->asd_sizes)
> /*
> * No OF, host with a list of subdevices. Don't try to mix
> * modes by initialising some groups statically and some
> --
> 2.0.0
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
