Hi Mauro, On Thu, 2014-09-04 at 12:36 -0300, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote: > Em Thu, 22 May 2014 14:48:07 +0200 > Paul Bolle <pebo...@tiscali.nl> escreveu: > > > dib0900.c has always shipped with its own, manual, configuration > > system. There a three problems with it. > > > > 1) macros that are defined, but not used: > > CONFIG_SYS_DVBT > > CONFIG_DIB0090_USE_PWM_AGC > > > > 2) checks for macros that are always true: > > CONFIG_SYS_ISDBT > > CONFIG_BAND_CBAND > > CONFIG_BAND_VHF > > CONFIG_BAND_UHF > > > > 3) checks for macros that are never defined and are always false: > > CONFIG_BAND_SBAND > > CONFIG_STANDARD_DAB > > CONFIG_STANDARD_DVBT > > CONFIG_TUNER_DIB0090_P1B_SUPPORT > > CONFIG_BAND_LBAND > > > > Remove all references to these macros, and, of course, remove the code > > hidden behind the macros that are never defined too. > > IMHO, it is OK to remove the macros that are always true and > the ones that aren't used.
I see. I hope to send a v2 that does that one of these days. > However, I don't like the idea of > removing the other macros. This is a tuner driver that can be used > on other bands, and some day we might end implementing analog support > for the Dibcom driver or to add something that will require the code > there. So, IMHO, better to keep the code there. But would you consider a patch that at least moves those macros out of the CONFIG_* namespace (ie, a patch that prefixes those macros with, say, DIB0090_)? Paul Bolle -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
