On Fri, Nov 21, 2014 at 11:13:17AM +0100, Hans de Goede wrote: > Hi, > > On 11/21/2014 10:59 AM, Maxime Ripard wrote: > > On Fri, Nov 21, 2014 at 09:42:09AM +0100, Hans de Goede wrote: > >> Hi, > >> > >> On 11/21/2014 09:26 AM, Maxime Ripard wrote: > >>> Hi Mauro, > >>> > >>> On Thu, Nov 20, 2014 at 02:28:56PM -0200, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote: > >>>> Em Thu, 20 Nov 2014 16:55:24 +0100 > >>>> Hans de Goede <hdego...@redhat.com> escreveu: > >>>> > >>>>> Add support for the larger fifo found on sun5i and sun6i, having a > >>>>> separate > >>>>> compatible for the ir found on sun5i & sun6i also is useful if we ever > >>>>> want > >>>>> to add ir transmit support, because the sun5i & sun6i version do not > >>>>> have > >>>>> transmit support. > >>>>> > >>>>> Note this commits also adds checking for the end-of-packet interrupt > >>>>> flag > >>>>> (which was already enabled), as the fifo-data-available interrupt flag > >>>>> only > >>>>> gets set when the trigger-level is exceeded. So far we've been getting > >>>>> away > >>>>> with not doing this because of the low trigger-level, but this is > >>>>> something > >>>>> which we should have done since day one. > >>>>> > >>>>> Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdego...@redhat.com> > >>>> > >>>> As this is meant to be merged via some other tree: > >>>> > >>>> Acked-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mche...@osg.samsung.com> > >>> > >>> I think merging it through your tree would be just fine. > >>> > >>> Acked-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime.rip...@free-electrons.com> > >> > >> Heh, I was thinking it would be best if it went through Maxime's tree > >> because > >> it also has some deps on new clk stuff (well the dts have deps on that), > >> but either > >> way works for me. > >> > >> Maxime if you want this go through Mauro's tree, I can send a pull-req to > >> Mauro > >> (I'm a linux-media sub-maintainer), so if that is the case let me know and > >> I'll > >> prepare a pull-req (after fixing the missing reset documentation in the > >> bindings). > > > > So much for not reading the cover letter... Sorry. > > > > We're getting quite close to the end of the ARM merge window, and I > > got a couple comments, Lee hasn't commented yet, so I'd say it's a bit > > too late for this to come in. > > Oh, but this was not intended for 3.19, this can wait till 3.20 from my pov, > sorry if that was not clear. I was assuming that the merge window was more > or less closed already, so that this going into 3.20 was expected.
Perfect then :) Maxime -- Maxime Ripard, Free Electrons Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering http://free-electrons.com
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
