Hi, On 23/05/15 14:03, Sakari Ailus wrote: > On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 03:28:40PM +0200, Sylwester Nawrocki wrote: >> flash-leds = <&flash_xx &image_sensor_x>, <...>; > > One more matter to consider: xenon flash devices. > > How about samsung,camera-flashes (and ti,camera-flashes)? After pondering > this awhile, I'm ok with removing the vendor prefix as well. > > Let me know what you think.
I thought about it a bit more and I have some doubts about semantics as above. I'm fine with 'camera-flashes' as far as name is concerned. Perhaps we should put only phandles to leds or xenon flash devices in the 'camera-flashes' property. I think it would be more future proof in case there is more nodes needed to describe the camera flash (or a camera module) than the above two. And phandles to corresponding image sensor device nodes would be put in a separate property. camera-flashes = <&flash_xx>, ... camera-flash-masters = <&image_sensor_x>, ... Then pairs at same index would describe a single flash, 0 would indicate a null entry if needed. Similarly we could create properties for other sub-devices of a camera module, like lenses, etc. -- Thanks, Sylwester -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
