On Mon, Jun 22, 2015 at 09:06:41AM +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 22, 2015 at 03:01:38AM +0200, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> > We can certainly replace the WARN() with pr_warn(), I don't see
> > how its confusing though as its a run time real issue. Either
> > way whatever you recommend is fine by me.
> 
> Yeah, it confused the 0day robot at least. :-)
> 
> But maybe because it cannot really read. But I've experienced cases
> where people don't read too, see *a* splat and raise the alarm. So yeah,
> I think a simple pr_warn would be much better.

OK I'll submit a follow up fix and say the robot reported it :)

 Luis
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in

Reply via email to