On 2016-03-14 13:52:17 +0100, Hans Verkuil wrote:
> On 03/14/2016 01:42 PM, Niklas Söderlund wrote:
> > Hi Hans,
> >
> > On 2016-02-29 11:16:39 +0100, Hans Verkuil wrote:
> >> From: Hans Verkuil <hans.verk...@cisco.com>
> >>
> >> Instead of a big if at the beginning, just check if g_selection == NULL
> >> and call the cropcap op immediately and return the result.
> >>
> >> No functional changes in this patch.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Hans Verkuil <hans.verk...@cisco.com>
> >> ---
> >> drivers/media/v4l2-core/v4l2-ioctl.c | 44
> >> ++++++++++++++++++------------------
> >> 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/drivers/media/v4l2-core/v4l2-ioctl.c
> >> b/drivers/media/v4l2-core/v4l2-ioctl.c
> >> index 86c4c19..67dbb03 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/media/v4l2-core/v4l2-ioctl.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/media/v4l2-core/v4l2-ioctl.c
> >> @@ -2157,33 +2157,33 @@ static int v4l_cropcap(const struct v4l2_ioctl_ops
> >> *ops,
> >> struct file *file, void *fh, void *arg)
> >> {
> >> struct v4l2_cropcap *p = arg;
> >> + struct v4l2_selection s = { .type = p->type };
> >> + int ret;
> >>
> >> - if (ops->vidioc_g_selection) {
> >> - struct v4l2_selection s = { .type = p->type };
> >> - int ret;
> >> + if (ops->vidioc_g_selection == NULL)
> >> + return ops->vidioc_cropcap(file, fh, p);
> >
> > I might be missing something but is there a guarantee
> > ops->vidioc_cropcap is not NULL here?
>
> There is, either vidioc_g_selection or vidioc_cropcap will always be
> non-NULL. Since g_selection == NULL it follows that cropcap != NULL.
>
> But I admit that it isn't exactly obvious since the test that ensures
> this is in determine_valid_ioctls() in v4l2-dev.c.
Nice, thanks for clarifying.
Reviewed-by: Niklas Söderlund <niklas.soderlund+rene...@ragnatech.se>
--
Regards,
Niklas Söderlund
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
