On Fri, Apr 21, 2000 at 07:48:01PM +0200, Florian Lohoff wrote: > On Fri, Apr 21, 2000 at 10:30:21AM -0700, Andreas Jaeger wrote: > Linux 2.0 is low priority IMHO as there is a "Standalone" Mips > port for 2.0 mainly used for the cobalts which has nevern been really > developed much further. Nobody (except the embedded people) will > use the 2.0 series now (And the embedded will use a smaller > libc anyways) 2.0 is dead as far as my interest in it goes. I'm however commited to continue support for 2.2 even after 2.4 is finally out. Ralf
- GLIBC 2.2 should work on MIPS-Linux Andreas Jaeger
- Re: GLIBC 2.2 should work on MIPS-Linux Andreas Jaeger
- Re: GLIBC 2.2 should work on MIPS-Linux Florian Lohoff
- Re: GLIBC 2.2 should work on MIPS-Linux Ralf Baechle
- Re: GLIBC 2.2 should work on MIPS-Linux Florian Lohoff
- Re: GLIBC 2.2 should work on MIPS-Linux Ralf Baechle
- Re: GLIBC 2.2 should work on MIPS-Linux Florian Lohoff
- Re: GLIBC 2.2 should work on MIPS-Linux Ralf Baechle
- Re: GLIBC 2.2 should work on MIPS-Linux Ulf Carlsson
- binutils 4 kernel Was: GLIBC 2.2 should work on ... Florian Lohoff
- Re: GLIBC 2.2 should work on MIPS-Linux Andreas Jaeger
