Linux-Misc Digest #197, Volume #27 Thu, 22 Feb 01 17:13:02 EST
Contents:
Re: MS to Enforce Registration - or Else
screensavers in redhat (andi smart)
Help with Software Raid Problem - Long ("Gary Barrentine")
Virtual/software UART? (SLee000)
drop folder ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Re: drop folder (Erik Hensema)
where to set PATH? (Todd Ahlstrom)
Re: using --exclude in rsync ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Re: where to set PATH? (Rodrigo Henriquez)
Re: Intruder (Silviu Minut)
Re: hide the title of an app (Lee Webb)
Identical logons... (Patrick M Geahan)
Re: drop folder ("Peter T. Breuer")
about keyboard mapping (Feng Ye)
Re: AOL + Linux ("Matt O'Toole")
Re: Best distro for old PC? ("Matt O'Toole")
Re: how to print man pages in good quality (Doug Poulin)
What took over inetd.conf in RH7 (Doug Poulin)
Re: how to print man pages in good quality (Jean-David Beyer)
Re: screensavers in redhat (Jean-David Beyer)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ()
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.advocacy
Subject: Re: MS to Enforce Registration - or Else
Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2001 19:26:48 -0000
On Mon, 19 Feb 2001 23:45:42 GMT, Robert Surenko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>In comp.os.linux.misc [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> On Fri, 16 Feb 2001 01:54:03 GMT, Robert Surenko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>In comp.os.linux.misc [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>>>> On Thu, 15 Feb 2001 22:00:09 GMT, Robert Surenko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>>>In comp.os.linux.misc [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>>>>>> On Thu, 15 Feb 2001 20:38:45 GMT, Robert Surenko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>>>>>In comp.os.linux.misc Johan Kullstam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>>>>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Dan Mercer) writes:
>>>>>
>>>
>>>I agree, so what. I'm saying that Science depends on faith.
>
>> That the universe works in a predictable fashion is not
>> an article of faith. It is an axiom that is time tested.
>
>Study physics... The universe does not work in a predictable fashion.
>That stuff ent out with Newton.
As long as you aren't dealing at the atomic level, it does
infact work in a predictable fashion. This forum would not
be possible otherwise.
>
>Axiom is "self-evident" truth. Most thinks have found great profit
>by challenging them.
>
>> [deletia]
>
>> You can choose to violate the rules and prove us wrong
>> in the process. Somehow, I suspect that you will choose
>> not to for your own survival.
>
>What rules? Are you asking me to bow to Science again?
No, just a simple proof by contradiction.
[deletia]
You are "bowing to Science" any time you go over a bridge,
or use an elevator, or fly in an aircraft, or merely
loiter in a highrise building.
--
>> Yes. And the mailer should never hand off directly to a program
>> that allows the content to take control.
>
>Well most mailers can, so I guess they all suck too.
Yup.
Candy from strangers should be treated as such.
|||
/ | \
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (andi smart)
Subject: screensavers in redhat
Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2001 19:32:59 GMT
I have just installed RH 6.1 (as 'gnome workstation')
I would really like it to use the BSOD screensaver, which displays
fine in the preview pane but won't actually run - I just get no image
at all on the monitor. Any movement from mouse or keyboard resumes
work so the screensaver element of this is working.
I have a monitor which was not listed, so I am using 'generic
mulitsync' running at 800x600 with 16bit colour.
OK, so it's trivial but ......
"A single open mind, can open any door" Sonia Rutstein
------------------------------
From: "Gary Barrentine" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Help with Software Raid Problem - Long
Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2001 14:46:49 -0500
Hello All,
I seem to be having some trouble getting Software RAID to work properly.
Everything seems to be setup properly and the system returns that RAID is
running. When I copy something to one of the RAID partitions, it does not
show up on the mirrored partition. If it does show up, it is an entry with
the same name as with was coppied, but ls reports there is an Input/Output
Error on that entry. I have taken listing from various configuration and
log files and listed them below. Any help would be appreciated.
Thanks
Gary Barrentine
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Kernel - 2.2.18
Added patch - raid-2.2.18-B0
Kernel Configuration
Multiple devices driver support - Built In
Autodetect RAID partitions - Built In
RAID-1 (mirroring) mode - Built In
raidtools-19990824-0.90.tar.gz - Installed
Listings from fdisk for the 2 SCSI drives
Disk /dev/sda: 64 heads, 32 sectors, 17366 cylinders
Units = cylinders of 2048 * 512 bytes
Device Boot Start End Blocks Id System
/dev/sda1 * 1 5000 5119984 83 Linux native
/dev/sda2 5001 10928 6070272 fd Linux raid autodetect
/dev/sda3 10929 16853 6067200 fd Linux raid autodetect
/dev/sda4 16854 17366 525312 82 Linux swap
Disk /dev/sdb: 64 heads, 32 sectors, 17366 cylinders
Units = cylinders of 2048 * 512 bytes
Device Boot Start End Blocks Id System
/dev/sdb1 1 5000 5119984 83 Linux native
/dev/sdb2 5001 10928 6070272 fd Linux raid autodetect
/dev/sdb3 10929 16853 6067200 fd Linux raid autodetect
/dev/sdb4 16854 17366 525312 82 Linux swap
End of fdisk listing
Listing from /etc/raidtab
# raidtab
# 02/20/2001 - G.Barrentine - Created
# 02/21/2001 - G.Barrentine - Added persistent-superblock option
# this is /usr3
raiddev /dev/md1
raid-level 1
nr-raid-disks 2
nr-spare-disks 0
chunk-size 4
persistent-superblock 1
device /dev/sda3
raid-disk 0
device /dev/sdb3
raid-disk 1
# this is /usr2
raiddev /dev/md0
raid-level 1
nr-raid-disks 2
nr-spare-disks 0
chunk-size 4
persistent-superblock 1
device /dev/sda2
raid-disk 0
device /dev/sdb2
raid-disk 1
End of /etc/raidtab
listing from /proc/mdstat
Personalities : [raid1]
read_ahead 1024 sectors
md0 : active raid1 sdb2[1] sda2[0] 6070208 blocks [2/2] [UU]
md1 : active raid1 sdb3[1] sda3[0] 6067136 blocks [2/2] [UU]
unused devices: <none>
End of /proc/mdstat
Some Lines from dmesg listing
md driver 0.90.0 MAX_MD_DEVS=256, MAX_REAL=12
raid1 personality registered
Partition check:
sda: sda1 sda2 sda3 sda4
sdb: sdb1 sdb2 sdb3 sdb4
md.c: sizeof(mdp_super_t) = 4096
autodetecting RAID arrays
(read) sda2's sb offset: 6070208 [events: 00000002]
(read) sda3's sb offset: 6067136 [events: 0000000a]
(read) sdb2's sb offset: 6070208 [events: 00000002]
(read) sdb3's sb offset: 6067136 [events: 0000000a]
autorun ...
considering sdb3 ...
adding sdb3 ...
adding sda3 ...
created md1
bind<sda3,1>
bind<sdb3,2>
running: <sdb3><sda3>
now!
sdb3's event counter: 0000000a
sda3's event counter: 0000000a
md1: max total readahead window set to 128k
md1: 1 data-disks, max readahead per data-disk: 128k
raid1: device sdb3 operational as mirror 1
raid1: device sda3 operational as mirror 0
(checking disk 0)
(really checking disk 0)
(checking disk 1)
(really checking disk 1)
raid1: raid set md1 active with 2 out of 2 mirrors
md: updating md1 RAID superblock on device
sdb3 [events: 0000000b](write) sdb3's sb offset: 6067136
sda3 [events: 0000000b](write) sda3's sb offset: 6067136
.
considering sdb2 ...
adding sdb2 ...
adding sda2 ...
created md0
bind<sda2,1>
bind<sdb2,2>
running: <sdb2><sda2>
now!
sdb2's event counter: 00000002
sda2's event counter: 00000002
md0: max total readahead window set to 128k
md0: 1 data-disks, max readahead per data-disk: 128k
raid1: device sdb2 operational as mirror 1
raid1: device sda2 operational as mirror 0
(checking disk 0)
(really checking disk 0)
(checking disk 1)
(really checking disk 1)
(checking disk 2)
(checking disk 3)
(checking disk 4)
(checking disk 5)
(checking disk 6)
(checking disk 7)
(checking disk 8)
(checking disk 9)
(checking disk 10)
(checking disk 11)
raid1: raid set md0 active with 2 out of 2 mirrors
md: updating md0 RAID superblock on device
sdb2 [events: 00000003](write) sdb2's sb offset: 6070208
sda2 [events: 00000003](write) sda2's sb offset: 6070208
.
... autorun DONE.
End dmesg listing
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (SLee000)
Date: 22 Feb 2001 19:45:59 GMT
Subject: Virtual/software UART?
I am developing a 'virtual/software' UART (Universal Asynchronous Receiver
Transmitter).
That is, using software to simulate the RS232 Serial port (COM0, COM1, COM2
etc.).
Instead of writing a byte to a hardware register and letting the hardware UART
( like an 8250 or
16550) shift the bits out, I will be doing the shifting in software,
writing/reading only to
a generic GPIO pin (as in an Intel Northbridge chipset) or to one pin of the
parallel port.
Has anyone developed something like this for Linux/UNIX before?
In a related question, Does anyone have sample code of a Linux kernal module
writing to the
8254 timer chip on a typical PC?
Thanks and best regards.
Sang
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.development.system,comp.os.linux.help,comp.os.linux.setup
Subject: drop folder
Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2001 11:53:40 -0800
I need to create on linux what in the MacOS is called a drop-folder. It
doesn't need to be a "real" directory, but needs to perform an action on
files that touch it or enter it.
I currently have an application that "watches" the directory scanning,
sleeping, scanning, sleeping, but I'd rather create something more real
time.
- Craig
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Erik Hensema)
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.development.system,comp.os.linux.help,comp.os.linux.setup
Subject: Re: drop folder
Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2001 21:09:02 +0100
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>I need to create on linux what in the MacOS is called a drop-folder.
>It doesn't need to be a "real" directory, but needs to perform an
>action on files that touch it or enter it.
>I currently have an application that "watches" the directory
>scanning, sleeping, scanning, sleeping, but I'd rather create
>something more real time.
As far as I know (and when I understand you correctly) this doesn't exist
under Linux, but when you're a programmer you may want to look at the
automounter code (kernel and userspace). It does something similar. 100%
userspace automounter implementations also exists, IIRC.
--
Erik Hensema ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) || ICQ# 8280101
A psychiatrist is a person who will give you expensive answers that
your wife will give you for free.
------------------------------
From: Todd Ahlstrom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: where to set PATH?
Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2001 20:14:37 GMT
I am currently using Red Hat 7.0. What file contains the PATH
variables? I need to add one for the Java Development Kit, but I can't
figure out where to do it. Also, can I put the new ones into effect
without rebooting? Thank you for the help.
Todd
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: using --exclude in rsync
Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2001 20:32:18 -0000
On Thu, 22 Feb 2001 08:28:29 -0800 Robert Lynch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
| [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
|>
|> I thought I had this working, but apparently not. The man page
|> just doesn't make any sense, and the examples aren't what I am
|> trying to do.
|>
|> What I want to do is exclude a whole tree from data being transferred
|> by rsync (client is getting data from the server). Can anyone give
|> a pattern for exclude to block a whole tree? As an example I want
|> to exclude a tree named "abc/xyz" relative to the directory which is
|> the target.
|>
|> --
|> -----------------------------------------------------------------
|> | Phil Howard - KA9WGN | Dallas | http://linuxhomepage.com/ |
|> | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | Texas, USA | http://phil.ipal.org/ |
|> -----------------------------------------------------------------
|
| I've been using this to backup a server over ssh (executed in /
| directory):
|
| rsync -ravze ssh --exclude='lost+found' --delete --delete-after\
| /bin /boot /dev /etc /home /lib \
| /opt /root /sbin /spare /usr /var\
| ives:/fw_bak
Are there any files in "lost+found"? Apparently what it does is
exclude the directory, but not the files found below it. If the
directory already exists at the target, the files below it still
get transferred.
Put a file in "lost+found". Now make "lost+found" in the target
location. Run the rsync backup. See if the file in "lost+found"
gets transferred.
--
=================================================================
| Phil Howard - KA9WGN | Dallas | http://linuxhomepage.com/ |
| [EMAIL PROTECTED] | Texas, USA | http://phil.ipal.org/ |
=================================================================
------------------------------
From: Rodrigo Henriquez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: where to set PATH?
Date: 22 Feb 2001 19:59:00 GMT
Todd Ahlstrom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am currently using Red Hat 7.0. What file contains the PATH
> variables? I need to add one for the Java Development Kit, but I can't
> figure out where to do it. Also, can I put the new ones into effect
> without rebooting? Thank you for the help.
~.bashrc
or
/etc/bashrc
Regards.
--
Rodrigo Henriquez M. | limb by limb and tooth by tooth
rhenriqu[@]linuxcenter.cl | tearing up inside of me
ICQ : 67102514 | every day everyhour wish that i...
http://nn.cl/~rhenriqu | was bullet proof
------------------------------
From: Silviu Minut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Intruder
Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2001 15:37:57 -0500
You sure it was ftp? I didn't see an ftp update on the RH site.
"Peter T. Breuer" wrote:
> root <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > http://www.redhat.com/support/errata/RHSA-2000-039.html for wuftpd. I can't
> > find the other patch. At any rate, these patches and others have been
> > incorporated in RH7.0. My file server was broken into last september through
> > the nfs bug. This was the reason I upgraded to RH7.0. I'm not saying RH7.0 is
> > bug free, but the best you can do, besides firewalls and stuff, is to keep an
>
> rh7.0 was also vulnerable via ftp. A colleague had an intruder - I
> believe rh have published an errata to cover the hole.
>
> Peter
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Lee Webb)
Subject: Re: hide the title of an app
Date: 22 Feb 2001 19:20:39 GMT
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 22 Feb 2001 04:47:28 GMT, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>Hi,
>I want to know how to hide the title bar of an application?
>e.g. I just want to show the main window (the box icon) of the
>xmailserver.
>---- Brittle
It's dependant on the Window Manager that you're using.
For example, to have xbiff only be displayed as the mail box without any
window decoration (i.e., titlebar and border) in FVWM2 you would do in the
.fvwm2rc:
Style "xbiff" NoTitle, BorderWidth 0, NoHandles
If you give us the WM that you're using there may be someone with knowledge
of that wm.
(P.S. I'd love to know who to do that in Sawmill/fish: no title, no border)
Lee.
------------------------------
From: Patrick M Geahan<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Identical logons...
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.setup
Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2001 20:59:15 GMT
I currently have a three-box network. One box Win98, another box running
Redhat 5.2, and a third which will either be running RH6.2 or NetBSD.
I have plans currently to use NIS or NIS+ to coordinate logons and home
directories between the LInux and BSD boxes. However, I got to thinking
about tying the Windows box in as well.
I have a pretty good idea of how to get the home directories in, but I'm
unsure as to the logons themselves. I haven't been able to find any
documentation as to whether Win98 works with NIS, or what.
Does anyone have any ideas? Is NIS the wrong tack altogether? Or will I
have to run a separate daemon for the Win98 logins?
Thanks in advance.
--
=======Patrick M [EMAIL PROTECTED]=======ICQ:3784715======
Quote of the Week: "Where in the bible does it say `God so loved the
world that he congested bandwidth by forwarding email to everyone in
his address book?'" - Tom Sevart in alt.folklore.urban
------------------------------
From: "Peter T. Breuer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.development.system,comp.os.linux.help,comp.os.linux.setup
Subject: Re: drop folder
Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2001 21:42:38 +0100
In comp.os.linux.help Erik Hensema <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>>I need to create on linux what in the MacOS is called a drop-folder.
>>It doesn't need to be a "real" directory, but needs to perform an
>>action on files that touch it or enter it.
>>I currently have an application that "watches" the directory
>>scanning, sleeping, scanning, sleeping, but I'd rather create
>>something more real time.
> As far as I know (and when I understand you correctly) this doesn't exist
> under Linux, but when you're a programmer you may want to look at the
> automounter code (kernel and userspace). It does something similar. 100%
> userspace automounter implementations also exists, IIRC.
I don't think he needs to be a programmer. The automount daemon
can be configured to run an executable when an access is made to a
certain directory. The problem is that it doesn't distinguish between
read and write access.
You could do it, but you'd have to work real hard with permissions and
so on.
Peter
------------------------------
Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2001 13:28:49 -0800
From: Feng Ye <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: about keyboard mapping
I successfully remap the keyboard using loadkeys under console, say, I map
keycode 125 = Delete key, but when I try to map it the same way under X11,
I failed when I try to use xmodmap -e " keycode 125 = Delete", is there
anybody who knows about itB?
keycode 125 is a unused key which there is a small windows icon on it.
many thanks.
------------------------------
From: "Matt O'Toole" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: AOL + Linux
Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2001 13:37:38 -0800
"Jeff Susanj" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> AOL is Linux hostile. They only make AOL for Windows 9xx and Macintosh.
> Even Windows NT is left out. I have to use an older version of AOL for
> windows 3.1 on NT. It may be possible to run AOL using Wine but I haven't
> tried it myself.
I don't think they're hostile. They probably just don't see a big enough
subscriber base to justify developing and supporting AOL for Linux. BTW,
there was a development version of AOL for Linux floating around, but the
program got cancelled. I'm not suprised they don't support NT, either. It
was never a mainstream OS in the sense that Win 95/98 and Mac are, at least
among the AOL demographic.
What AOL *ought* to do, and should have been working towards a long time
ago, is moving their service off your hard drive, and onto their servers.
That way, your account and settings could be accessed from any browser on
any computer. It would be the biggest application service provider project
ever, and quite an expensive and challenging task. But software development
and support costs would be radically lower in the long run, as well as the
cost of maintaining all those dial-up POPs. And boy, could they ever
collect data!
Matt O.
------------------------------
From: "Matt O'Toole" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Best distro for old PC?
Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2001 13:43:52 -0800
> Rob Chambers wrote:
> > I'm thinking of building a system to play with out of some old parts.
> > It's likely to be a 33MHz 486DX with 4 or 8 Mb RAM, 250 Mb HD (80 + 170)
> > and no CD-ROM. I've been recommended muLinux, are there any other good
> > distros for such a machine? I'm not bothered about running X on such a
> > machine if it's not really feasible.
"Stanislaw Flatto" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> You don't need mu (micro) Linux.
> With 8M RAM and a "borrowed" CD installed Slackware 7.0 (OK stripped from
> GUI and other non-essential parts). Works like a charm.
> The HD is 256M with space left.
There's a version of Slackware called "Zipslack," designed to run from a
100MB Zip disk. I've tried it, and it works great. It's probably exactly
what you're looking for. It's easier to start small and add what you need
rather than start huge and strip out what you don't.
Matt O.
------------------------------
Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2001 17:00:25 -0500
From: Doug Poulin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: how to print man pages in good quality
bv wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I tried to print them from the KDE help, but it looks ugly.
>
> Can anyone tell me how to print man pages in really good quality?
>
> --
> Bastian Voigt
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Since I spit mine out to a postscript printer, I use:
man -tPS <manpage> | lpr -P<printer>
So, If I want to print the man page on lpr, 'man -tPS lpr | lpr -Pbw' to
a printer I have setup as 'bw'.
--
------------------------------
Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2001 17:01:48 -0500
From: Doug Poulin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: What took over inetd.conf in RH7
Am I correct in assuming (never assume!) that inetd.conf has died in
RH7, and been replaced with scripts under /etc/rc.d/init.d/
If not, where is the script that I can go in and remove what is running
and what is not running?
thanks!
--
------------------------------
From: Jean-David Beyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: how to print man pages in good quality
Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2001 16:59:30 -0500
Bob Tennent wrote:
>
> On Thu, 22 Feb 2001 17:40:49 +0100, bv wrote:
> >
> >Can anyone tell me how to print man pages in really good quality?
>
> man -t <command> | lpr
>
That works pretty well for me for almost all commands, but some are
screwed up the same way as if you do man command | lpr instead of
man command | col -b | lpr . I.e., some stuff obviously meant to be
in bold is sloppily overtyped on my HP 660Cse printer that otherwise
does very well.
For example, on my machine, man vacation (part of sendmail package)
works just fine on my screen, but I get the sloppy results I
described if I do man -t vacation | lpr. Most commands print just
fine that way.
--
.~. Jean-David Beyer Registered Linux User 85642.
/V\ Registered Machine 73926.
/( )\ Shrewsbury, New Jersey
^^-^^ 4:55pm up 2 days, 29 min, 3 users, load average: 2.54, 2.36,
2.19
------------------------------
From: Jean-David Beyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: screensavers in redhat
Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2001 17:03:39 -0500
andi smart wrote:
>
> I have just installed RH 6.1 (as 'gnome workstation')
>
> I would really like it to use the BSOD screensaver, which displays
> fine in the preview pane but won't actually run - I just get no image
> at all on the monitor. Any movement from mouse or keyboard resumes
> work so the screensaver element of this is working.
I had that one working on RH 6.0, and I believe it works on 6.2.3.
IIRC, you have to let it run at maximum speed or it does not run at
all (which is a little faster than I prefer. The first time the
BSOD came up, I automatically reached for the panic button (but
managed not to press it) before I remembered what a UNIX kernel
panic looks like. I glanced at the Linux kernel source, and see is
it quite similar to what I remember. I have never seen it come up,
on a Linux system though.
I actually prefer the rotating 4-dimensional hypercube.
>
> I have a monitor which was not listed, so I am using 'generic
> mulitsync' running at 800x600 with 16bit colour.
>
> OK, so it's trivial but ......
> "A single open mind, can open any door" Sonia Rutstein
--
.~. Jean-David Beyer Registered Linux User 85642.
/V\ Registered Machine 73926.
/( )\ Shrewsbury, New Jersey
^^-^^ 5:00pm up 2 days, 34 min, 3 users, load average: 2.11, 2.19,
2.16
------------------------------
** FOR YOUR REFERENCE **
The service address, to which questions about the list itself and requests
to be added to or deleted from it should be directed, is:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can send mail to the entire list by posting to comp.os.linux.misc.
Linux may be obtained via one of these FTP sites:
ftp.funet.fi pub/Linux
tsx-11.mit.edu pub/linux
sunsite.unc.edu pub/Linux
End of Linux-Misc Digest
******************************
