On Mon, Sep 21, 2009 at 2:55 PM, Hugh Dickins <[email protected]> wrote: >> The callback setup from ->read() just looks gross. However, it's your >> call Hugh so I'll just shut up now. ;-) > > Ah, no, please don't! So it's _that_ end of it that's upsetting you, > and rightly so, I hadn't grasped that.
Heh, right. :-) On Mon, Sep 21, 2009 at 2:55 PM, Hugh Dickins <[email protected]> wrote: > (Nitin, your patch division is quite wrong: you should present a patch > in which your driver works, albeit poorly, without the notifier; then > a patch in which the notifier is added at the swapfile.c end and your > driver end, so we can see how they fit together.) Yes, please. Such standalone driver could go into drivers/staging for 2.6.32 probably. _______________________________________________ linux-mm-cc mailing list [email protected] http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/linux-mm-cc
