On Mon, 26 Apr 2010 14:17:04 +0400
Anton Vorontsov <cbouatmai...@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Sun, Apr 25, 2010 at 11:28:17PM +0100, Matt Fleming wrote:
> > On Wed, 21 Apr 2010 19:43:32 +0800, zhangfei gao <zhangfei....@gmail.com> 
> > wrote:
> > > 
> > > There is compile error when we enable CONFIG_MMC_SDHCI_IO_ACCESSORS,
> > > and include header file #include "sdhci.h"
> > > error: macro "writel" passed 3 arguments, but takes just 2
> > > 
> > 
> > Interesting...
> > 
> > It was Anton Vorontsov that added this code; presumably the code has
> > never been compiled for an ARM board (or any other architecture that
> > #define's their I/O accessors in asm/io.h).
> 
> Yep, there wasn't any need for these accessors on other platforms.
> 
> > It would be better if all architectures declared their I/O accessors as
> > static inline, but I'm not volunteering to touch all those headers ;-)
> > Renaming the SDHCI ops is definitely the easiest option. Anton, do you
> > have a problem with the attached patch to rename the SDHCI accessor
> > functions?
> 
> Looks OK.
> 
> Acked-by: Anton Vorontsov <cbouatmai...@gmail.com>
> (for -next, I presume)

Why not for 2.6.34?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to