On Thu, May 13, 2010 at 08:42:42AM +0200, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
> On Wed, 12 May 2010, Andrew Morton wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 11 May 2010 12:07:07 +0200 (CEST)
> > Guennadi Liakhovetski <g.liakhovet...@gmx.de> wrote:
> >
> > > 2.6.35 release is approaching and Ian hasn't found time yet to review
> > > this
> > > series, so I was wondering, maybe you could take it into mm at least for
> > > now?
> >
> > Well I did, but I don't know how useful that was.
> >
> > WHo is the most appropriate tree-maintainer to review and possibly
> > merge these?
>
> Samuel has already acked the MFD patch:
>
> http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.ports.sh.devel/7985
>
> (please, add this his ack to the patch too). Most of the patches in the
> series are SuperH- or SH-Mobile specific, which makes Paul (added to CC)
> the perfect candidate to review them. There is only one tmio-specific
> patch, and it is also the most complicated one. You or Paul can certainly
> just follow it to verify, that it doesn't introduce any regressions. I can
> also confirm it, because I also tested the patched driver without DMA
> loaded, and it worked just like before in PIO mode. It would, however, be
> great to test the patches on a non-sdhi hardware, of which none of us,
> probably, has any. I added Philipp Zabel to CC, who has contributed a few
> patches to tmio_mmc in the past, perhaps, he still has access to the
> hardware and could test these patches.
>
I don't have any problems taking all of the SH and SDHI related bits, but
since they all depend on the tmio_mmc change I haven't picked them up
yet. They'll likely continue to sit in my patch queue until something
happens with the tmio_mmc changes. Given the response times we've had
with any tmio related changes in the past I'm not exactly betting on a
speedy resolution..
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
