On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 11:34 AM, Andrew Morton <a...@linux-foundation.org> wrote: > On Sat, 12 Jun 2010 14:44:50 +0900 > Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.p...@samsung.com> wrote: > >> From: Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.p...@samsung.com> >> >> Some host controller can set mmc->caps before sdhci_add_host. >> >> Signed-off-by: Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.p...@samsung.com> >> --- >> drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c | 2 +- >> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c >> index 4321e0c..142419c 100644 >> --- a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c >> +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c >> @@ -1791,7 +1791,7 @@ int sdhci_add_host(struct sdhci_host *host) >> else >> mmc->f_min = host->max_clk / 256; >> mmc->f_max = host->max_clk; >> - mmc->caps = MMC_CAP_SDIO_IRQ; >> + mmc->caps |= MMC_CAP_SDIO_IRQ; >> >> if (!(host->quirks & SDHCI_QUIRK_FORCE_1_BIT_DATA)) >> mmc->caps |= MMC_CAP_4_BIT_DATA; > > A great shower of MMC patches have magically turned up in linux-next, > apparently via some tree of Grant's. Those patches changed the above > code to look like: > > if (!(host->quirks & SDHCI_QUIRK_NO_SDIO_IRQ)) > mmc->caps |= MMC_CAP_SDIO_IRQ; > > So it appears that this bug is fixed in that code as well. So I'll > drop your patch. If the above changes end up not getting merged into > mainline then your fix will be lost. > > That fix was unchangelogged. In fact the patch was completely > unchangelogged and I haven't looked at it at all and as far as I can > tell none of it has been sent to the mmc list.
I messed it up by pushing the wrong branch. I'm pulling it out now and it won't be in the next linux-next. g. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
