Hi Chris,
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-devices-mmc
> > @@ -0,0 +1,19 @@
> > +What:
> /sys/devices/.../mmc_host/mmcX/mmcX:XXXX/enhanced_area_offset
> > +Date: January 2011
> > +Contact: Chuanxiao Dong <chuanxiao.d...@intel.com>
> > +Description:
> > + Enhanced area is a new feature defined in eMMC4.4
> > standard.eMMC4.4
> or
> > + later card can support such feature. This kind of area can help
> > to
> > + improve the card performance. If the feature is enabled, this
> > attribute
> > + will indicate the start address of enhanced data area. If not,
> > this
> > + attribute will be -EINVAL. Unit Byte. Format decimal.
> > +
> > +What:
> > /sys/devices/.../mmc_host/mmcX/mmcX:XXXX/enhanced_area_size
> > +Date: January 2011
> > +Contact: Chuanxiao Dong <chuanxiao.d...@intel.com>
> > +Description:
> > + Enhanced area is a new feature defined in eMMC4.4 standard.
> > eMMC4.4
> or
> > + later card can support such feature. This kind of area can help
> > to
> > + improve the card performance. If the feature is enabled, this
> > attribute
> > + will indicate the size of enhanced data area. If not, this
> > attribute
> > + will be -EINVAL. Unit KByte. Format decimal.
>
> This is still wrapped at > 80 columns.
Sorry for that. I have set the textwidth=80 for vim, not understand why this is
still wrapped at >80 columns... I know checkpatch.pl can help us to find the
style problem, and is there some other script which can help find the style
problem of Document or how can I avoid such errors?
Chris, thank you for your kind patience to help me find these stupid errors
again...
> > diff --git a/include/linux/mmc/card.h b/include/linux/mmc/card.h
> > index 8ce0827..736697f 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/mmc/card.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/mmc/card.h
> > @@ -54,6 +54,9 @@ struct mmc_ext_csd {
> > unsigned int sec_trim_mult; /* Secure trim multiplier */
> > unsigned int sec_erase_mult; /* Secure erase multiplier */
> > unsigned int trim_timeout; /* In milliseconds */
> > + bool enhanced_area_en; /* enhanced area en */
> > + loff_t enhanced_area_offset; /* enhanced area addr */
> > + size_t enhanced_area_size; /* enhanced area size */
>
> Now enhanced_area_en is aligned correctly, but the other two aren't.
>
> This adds a warning:
>
> drivers/mmc/core/mmc.c: In function ‘mmc_enhanced_area_size_show’:
> drivers/mmc/core/mmc.c:383:261: warning: format ‘%d’ expects type ‘int’,
> but argument 3 has type ‘size_t’
>
> If you really want size_t, you should use %zu for it -- see
> Documentation/printk-formats.txt. (Declaring it as unsigned int would
> work fine too.)
>
> Oh, and let's mention the units of _offset and _size in the comment in
> card.h.
Chris, you mean the type of _offset and _size? I think the 64bits number for
_offset is enough, also the 32bits number for _size since the units of _size is
Kbytes. Any suggestions on that?
>
> > };
> >
> > struct sd_scr {
> > diff --git a/include/linux/mmc/mmc.h b/include/linux/mmc/mmc.h
> > index 612301f..264ba54 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/mmc/mmc.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/mmc/mmc.h
> > @@ -253,6 +253,8 @@ struct _mmc_csd {
> > * EXT_CSD fields
> > */
> >
> > +#define EXT_CSD_PARTITION_ATTRIBUTE 156 /* R/W */
> > +#define EXT_CSD_PARTITION_SUPPORT 160 /* RO */
> > #define EXT_CSD_ERASE_GROUP_DEF 175 /* R/W */
> > #define EXT_CSD_ERASED_MEM_CONT 181 /* RO */
> > #define EXT_CSD_BUS_WIDTH 183 /* R/W */
> > @@ -262,6 +264,7 @@ struct _mmc_csd {
> > #define EXT_CSD_CARD_TYPE 196 /* RO */
> > #define EXT_CSD_SEC_CNT 212 /* RO, 4 bytes */
> > #define EXT_CSD_S_A_TIMEOUT 217 /* RO */
> > +#define EXT_CSD_HC_WP_GRP_SIZE 221 /* RO */
> > #define EXT_CSD_ERASE_TIMEOUT_MULT 223 /* RO */
> > #define EXT_CSD_HC_ERASE_GRP_SIZE 224 /* RO */
> > #define EXT_CSD_SEC_TRIM_MULT 229 /* RO */
>
> Thanks,
>
> --
> Chris Ball <c...@laptop.org> <http://printf.net/>
> One Laptop Per Child
