On Saturday 12 February 2011 18:23:58 Shawn Guo wrote:
> Well, we are removing inclusion of mach/dma.h from mmc driver, but
> adding it to every mxs based machine code. This makes mmc driver
> clean but machine code becomes not. For some dma client devices
> coming later, the platform data could be saved at all, if they do not
> have any. But with the approach you are suggesting, every single
> client device will have to get platform data.
Right, unless there is a way to encode it exlusively in the resources,
which is what I was suggesting at first: If the dma engine driver
knows about all the channels, you only need to pass the channel number.
If you use a flattened device tree, you can avoid the need for
platform data by adding the phandle of the dma engine device to
a property of the mmc driver, along with the channel number inside
of that device. I think that would be the cleanest approach, but
some people still need to be convinced that changing drivers to
use fdt data is the right direction for ARM.
Arnd
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
