On Wednesday 13 April 2011, John Calixto wrote:
> Gah! OK, so much for the v5 I just sent then. What do you think about
> the compat_ioctl that I sent in v2? It means having the extra 32-bit
> compat structure, but at least all the compat overhead is conditional
> upon CONFIG_COMPAT. If you're not using CONFIG_COMPAT, you don't get
> any compat cruft.
>
A single __u64 is sufficient, because the user space will do the correct
conversion from pointer to 64-bit integer then. The only conversion
you need to worry about is the actual pointer to the main structure,
which needs the compat_ptr() magic.
Arnd
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
