On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 04:48:47PM +0800, Shawn Guo wrote:
> The patch turns the common stuff in sdhci-pltfm.c into functions, and
> add device drivers their own .probe and .remove which in turn call
> into the common functions, so that those sdhci-pltfm device drivers
> register itself and keep all device specific things away from common
> sdhci-pltfm file.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Shawn Guo <shawn....@linaro.org>
> ---

I'll second the comments from Grant (with one slight exception which is
noted below)

> +static int __devexit sdhci_dove_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
> +{
> +     struct sdhci_host *host = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
> +     int dead = 0;
> +     u32 scratch;
> +
> +     scratch = readl(host->ioaddr + SDHCI_INT_STATUS);
> +     if (scratch == (u32)-1)
> +             dead = 1;

I'd prefer

        dead = (readl() == 0xffffffff);

(or (u32)-1 if you prefer). But keeping a variable 'dead' is more
descriptive than keeping 'scratch'.

> +MODULE_LICENSE("GPL v2");

Just to be sure: Did you double-check if the original licenses were v2
or v2+?

> --- a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-pltfm.c
> +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-pltfm.c

[...]

> -err_add_host:
> -     if (pdata && pdata->exit)
> -             pdata->exit(host);
> -err_plat_init:
> -     iounmap(host->ioaddr);
>  err_remap:
>       release_mem_region(iomem->start, resource_size(iomem));
>  err_request:
>       sdhci_free_host(host);
>  err:
> -     printk(KERN_ERR"Probing of sdhci-pltfm failed: %d\n", ret);
> -     return ret;
> +     pr_err("%s failed %d\n", __func__, ret);

dev_err?

> +     return NULL;
>  }
>  

I didn't pay much attention to the OF version of the tegra driver, since
it still is not upstream yet, right?

Regards,

   Wolfram

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                           | Wolfram Sang                |
Industrial Linux Solutions                 | http://www.pengutronix.de/  |

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply via email to