Hi Takashi,

On Thu, Apr 21 2011, Takashi Iwai wrote:
> On HP laptops with JMicron 388 chip, the write-locked SD card isn't
> detected correctly as read-only in many cases.  This is because the
> PRESENT_STATE register becomes unsable just after plugging, and it
> returns the WRITE_PROTECT bit wrongly at the first read.
>
> This patch fixes the read-only detection by adding the own get_ro op
> for checking the register more intensively with a relatively long
> delay.
>
> The patch is tested with 2.6.39-rc4 kernel.
>
> Cc: Aries Lee <aries...@jmicron.com>
> Signed-off-by: Takashi Iwai <ti...@suse.de>
> ---
>  drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-pci.c |   34 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 files changed, 34 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-pci.c b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-pci.c
> index a136be7..9037b2a 100644
> --- a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-pci.c
> +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-pci.c
> @@ -346,6 +346,35 @@ static void jmicron_enable_mmc(struct sdhci_host *host, 
> int on)
>       writeb(scratch, host->ioaddr + 0xC0);
>  }
>  
> +/* As PRESENT_STATE register becomes unstable just after plugging,
> + * need to check the RO-cap multiple times with a relatively long delay.
> + */
> +
> +#define SAMPLE_COUNT 5
> +
> +static unsigned int jmicron_get_ro(struct sdhci_host *host)
> +{
> +     int i, ro_count;
> +
> +     ro_count = 0;
> +     for (i = 0; i < SAMPLE_COUNT; i++) {
> +             int present = sdhci_readl(host, SDHCI_PRESENT_STATE);
> +             if (!(present & SDHCI_WRITE_PROTECT)) {
> +                     if (++ro_count > SAMPLE_COUNT / 2)
> +                             return 1;
> +             }
> +             msleep(30);
> +     }
> +     return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int sdhci_pci_enable_dma(struct sdhci_host *host);
> +
> +static struct sdhci_ops jmicron_pci_ops = {
> +     .enable_dma     = sdhci_pci_enable_dma,
> +     .get_ro         = jmicron_get_ro,
> +};
> +
>  static int jmicron_probe_slot(struct sdhci_pci_slot *slot)
>  {
>       if (slot->chip->pdev->revision == 0) {
> @@ -383,6 +412,11 @@ static int jmicron_probe_slot(struct sdhci_pci_slot 
> *slot)
>  
>       slot->host->mmc->caps |= MMC_CAP_BUS_WIDTH_TEST;
>  
> +     /* Replace the ops for unstable get_ro detection */
> +     if (slot->chip->pdev->device == PCI_DEVICE_ID_JMICRON_JMB388_SD ||
> +         slot->chip->pdev->device == PCI_DEVICE_ID_JMICRON_JMB388_ESD)
> +             slot->host->ops = &jmicron_pci_ops;
> +
>       return 0;
>  }

I don't like overwriting ops here -- it's too magical, and now we have
to maintain the ops table in two places.  A quirk seems justified here,
even though we're trying to reduce them in general.  Can anyone find a
better solution?

Thanks,

- Chris.
-- 
Chris Ball   <c...@laptop.org>   <http://printf.net/>
One Laptop Per Child
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to