Hi Wolfram,

2011/4/26 Wolfram Sang <w.s...@pengutronix.de>:
>> > * Where is the patch that implements the get_shared_pins() hook in
>> >  your driver?
>> We send the common level patch ahead to get the upstream agreement so
>> that we can maintain our bottom level sdhci codes better. We will send
>> the special driver patch after some time.
>
> Hmm, why should be there a functionality if there is no user for it? A
> reference user helps people understand how it is intended to be used.

completely right. Of course this patch is based on real applications
and SoCs. We are using ARASAN sd controller IP, it can be configurated
to use shared pins mode in SoC design. And it looks like it is a
common requirement to save chip footprint by sharing data bus between
multi-controllers.

Just because Our SoCs are still on the way to opensource and mainline.
Even our arch/arm/mach-xxx hasn't been merged yet. Our target is
syncing our codes with mainline. So as a modification to sdhci common
level, we just get upstream's opinion for local maintaining earlier.

Anyway, this patch may be applied later after our others are ready. Or
it can be now so that other SoC companies can use this feature.

>
> Regards,
>
>   Wolfram
>
> --
> Pengutronix e.K.                           | Wolfram Sang                |
> Industrial Linux Solutions                 | http://www.pengutronix.de/  |
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to