Hi Koen, thanks for v2.
On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 09:52:01PM +0200, Koen Beel wrote:
> (Sorry, patch in attachment as I still don't have a decent mail setup
> at my company)
That's bad :(
====
> Fix clock rate setting on mxs-mmc driver.
> Previously, if div2 was zero the value for TIMING_CLOCK_RATE would
> have been 255 instead of 0.
> Also the limits for div1 (TIMING_CLOCK_DIVIDE) and div2
> (TIMING_CLOCK_RATE + 1) where not correctly defined.
Very minor nit: No paragraphs I'd say.
> Can easily be reproduced on mx23evk: default clock for high speed sdio
> cards is 50 MHz. With a SSP_CLK of 28.8 MHz default), this resulted in
> an actual clock rate of about 56 kHz.
> Tested on mx23evk.
>
> Changes in V2 patch:
> - use DIV_ROUND_UP to make sure the actual clock rate is not higher
> then the requested clock rate.
> - rename variables to reflect naming in datasheet and to make things
> more clear
Changelogs are good, but should go below "---"
>
> Signed-off-by: Koen Beel <koen.b...@barco.com>
> ---
> drivers/mmc/host/mxs-mmc.c | 30 ++++++++++++++----------------
> 1 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/mxs-mmc.c b/drivers/mmc/host/mxs-mmc.c
> index 99d39a6..d513d47 100644
> --- a/drivers/mmc/host/mxs-mmc.c
> +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/mxs-mmc.c
> @@ -564,40 +564,38 @@ static void mxs_mmc_request(struct mmc_host *mmc,
> struct mmc_request *mrq)
>
> static void mxs_mmc_set_clk_rate(struct mxs_mmc_host *host, unsigned int
> rate)
> {
> - unsigned int ssp_rate, bit_rate;
> - u32 div1, div2;
> + unsigned int ssp_clk, ssp_sck;
ssp_sck is not really needed? Value could directly go to host->clk_rate.
> + u32 clock_divide, clock_rate;
> u32 val;
>
> - ssp_rate = clk_get_rate(host->clk);
> + ssp_clk = clk_get_rate(host->clk);
>
> - for (div1 = 2; div1 < 254; div1 += 2) {
> - div2 = ssp_rate / rate / div1;
> - if (div2 < 0x100)
> + for (clock_divide = 2; clock_divide <= 254; clock_divide += 2) {
> + clock_rate = DIV_ROUND_UP(ssp_clk, rate * clock_divide);
> + clock_rate = (clock_rate > 0) ? clock_rate - 1 : 0;
> + if (clock_rate <= 255)
> break;
> }
>
> - if (div1 >= 254) {
> + if (clock_divide > 254) {
> dev_err(mmc_dev(host->mmc),
> "%s: cannot set clock to %d\n", __func__, rate);
Didn't you want to set some minimal values instead of just returning?
Just wondering, could be a seperate patch in my book...
> return;
> }
>
> - if (div2 == 0)
> - bit_rate = ssp_rate / div1;
> - else
> - bit_rate = ssp_rate / div1 / div2;
> + ssp_sck = ssp_clk / clock_divide / (1 + clock_rate);
>
> val = readl(host->base + HW_SSP_TIMING);
> val &= ~(BM_SSP_TIMING_CLOCK_DIVIDE | BM_SSP_TIMING_CLOCK_RATE);
> - val |= BF_SSP(div1, TIMING_CLOCK_DIVIDE);
> - val |= BF_SSP(div2 - 1, TIMING_CLOCK_RATE);
> + val |= BF_SSP(clock_divide, TIMING_CLOCK_DIVIDE);
> + val |= BF_SSP(clock_rate, TIMING_CLOCK_RATE);
> writel(val, host->base + HW_SSP_TIMING);
>
> - host->clk_rate = bit_rate;
> + host->clk_rate = ssp_sck;
>
> dev_dbg(mmc_dev(host->mmc),
> - "%s: div1 %d, div2 %d, ssp %d, bit %d, rate %d\n",
> - __func__, div1, div2, ssp_rate, bit_rate, rate);
> + "%s: clock_divide %d, clock_rate %d, ssp_clk %d, rate_actual
> %d, rate_requested %d\n",
> + __func__, clock_divide, clock_rate, ssp_clk, ssp_sck, rate);
> }
>
Rest looks good to me, and test was also successful.
Chris, if you want to take this version already:
Reviewed-by: Wolfram Sang <w.s...@pengutronix.de>
--
Pengutronix e.K. | Wolfram Sang |
Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
