On Tuesday 21 February 2012 05:50 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 05:43:54PM +0530, S, Venkatraman wrote:
On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 3:33 PM, Rajendra Nayak<rna...@ti.com> wrote:
@@ -324,8 +302,8 @@ static int omap_hsmmc_reg_get(struct omap_hsmmc_host
*host)
mmc_slot(host).ocr_mask = ocr_value;
} else {
if (!(mmc_slot(host).ocr_mask& ocr_value)) {
- pr_err("MMC%d ocrmask %x is not
supported\n",
- host->id,
mmc_slot(host).ocr_mask);
+ pr_err("MMC ocrmask %x is not
supported\n",
+ mmc_slot(host).ocr_mask);
You're dropping the MMC number from these error messages. It would be
much better to fix them instead. Use dev_info(mmc_dev(host->mmc), "blah"
rather than pr_err().
Thanks for catching this. There are a few other instance of pr_* usage
within the driver. I will post a patch to fix all of them.
Drivers should not be using pr_* unless they really do not have a struct
device.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
