Hi,

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Chris Ball [mailto:c...@laptop.org]
> Sent: Saturday, March 03, 2012 6:12 AM
> To: Chanho Park
> Cc: linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org; Kyungmin Park; Guennadi Liakhovetski
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] mmc: core: remove waiting time when clkgate_delay is
> set
> 
> Hi,
> 
> On Wed, Feb 29 2012, Chanho Park wrote:
> > Since recent commit("mmc: core: Use delayed work in clock gating
> > framework":597dd9d79cfbbb1), we always wait "unnecessary" default
> > clock delay(8 cycles). Actually, we don't need it if clkgate_delay
> > (unit:ms) is set because we already wait sufficient time to change the
> > clock due to delayed_workqueue.
> > This patch removes duplicated waiting time when clkgate_delay is set.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Chanho Park <chanho61.p...@samsung.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.p...@samsung.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/mmc/core/host.c |    7 +++++--
> >  1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/mmc/core/host.c b/drivers/mmc/core/host.c index
> > c3704e2..d710ce0 100644
> > --- a/drivers/mmc/core/host.c
> > +++ b/drivers/mmc/core/host.c
> > @@ -109,8 +109,11 @@ static void mmc_host_clk_gate_delayed(struct
> mmc_host *host)
> >      */
> >     if (!host->clk_requests) {
> >             spin_unlock_irqrestore(&host->clk_lock, flags);
> > -           tick_ns = DIV_ROUND_UP(1000000000, freq);
> > -           ndelay(host->clk_delay * tick_ns);
> > +           /* wait only when clk_gate_delay is 0*/
> > +           if (!host->clkgate_delay) {
> > +                   tick_ns = DIV_ROUND_UP(1000000000, freq);
> > +                   ndelay(host->clk_delay * tick_ns);
> > +           }
> >     } else {
> >             /* New users appeared while waiting for this work */
> >             spin_unlock_irqrestore(&host->clk_lock, flags);
> 
> Have you seen Guennadi's patch?
> 
> http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/cjb/mmc.git;a=commitdiff;h=63871
> af54a0f0053de6534afe8da101b988b86b6

I'd already seen the patch. There is no problem if a user didn't set a 
clkgate_delay.
However, if he wants to set a "clkgate_delay", a "clk_delay" is no longer 
needed.
Because, clk_delay(basically 8 cycles) always fall within "clkgate_delay".
I remove this "duplicated" wait.

Best regards,
Chanho Park

> 
> - Chris.
> --
> Chris Ball   <c...@laptop.org>   <http://printf.net/>
> One Laptop Per Child

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to