On 03/03/2012 12:29 AM, Per Förlin wrote:
> On 03/02/2012 09:51 AM, Ulf HANSSON wrote:
>> Hi Jaehoon,
>>
>> I did not know this. Which host driver are you using? I would very much
>> appreciate of you could debug and share some result.
>>
>> Thanks!
>>
>> BR
>> Ulf Hansson
>>
>> On 03/02/2012 09:28 AM, Jaehoon Chung wrote:
>>> Hi Ulf.
>>>
>>> I tested with this patch.
>>> But in my environment, this patch didn't work fine before.
>>> 1) When remove/insert, didn't entered the suspend.
>>> 2) When removed during something write,
>>> [ 50.755067] FAT-fs (mmcblk1p1): Directory bread(block 8254) failed
>>> [ 50.761235] FAT-fs (mmcblk1p1): Directory bread(block 8255) failed
>>> then at next-time, didn't detect sd-card.
>>>
>>> Did you know this?
>>> If you want more information, i will debug, and share the result.
>>>
>>> Best Regards,
>>> Jaehoon Chung
>>>
>>> On 03/02/2012 12:44 AM, Ulf Hansson wrote:
>>>
>>>> Make sure mmc_start_req cancel the prepared job, if the request
>>>> was prevented to be started due to the card has been removed.
>>>>
>>>> This bug was introduced in commit:
>>>> mmc: allow upper layers to know immediately if card has been removed
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson<ulf.hans...@stericsson.com>
>>>> ---
>>>> drivers/mmc/core/core.c | 35 +++++++++++++++--------------------
>>>> 1 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/core/core.c b/drivers/mmc/core/core.c
>>>> index 0b317f0..9e562ab 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/mmc/core/core.c
>>>> +++ b/drivers/mmc/core/core.c
>>>> @@ -249,16 +249,17 @@ static void mmc_wait_done(struct mmc_request *mrq)
>>>> complete(&mrq->completion);
>>>> }
>>>>
>>>> -static void __mmc_start_req(struct mmc_host *host, struct mmc_request
>>>> *mrq)
>>>> +static int __mmc_start_req(struct mmc_host *host, struct mmc_request *mrq)
>>>> {
>>>> init_completion(&mrq->completion);
>>>> mrq->done = mmc_wait_done;
>>>> if (mmc_card_removed(host->card)) {
>>>> mrq->cmd->error = -ENOMEDIUM;
>>>> complete(&mrq->completion);
>>>> - return;
>>>> + return -ENOMEDIUM;
>>>> }
>>>> mmc_start_request(host, mrq);
>>>> + return 0;
>>>> }
>>>>
>>>> static void mmc_wait_for_req_done(struct mmc_host *host,
>>>> @@ -342,6 +343,7 @@ struct mmc_async_req *mmc_start_req(struct mmc_host
>>>> *host,
>>>> struct mmc_async_req *areq, int *error)
>>>> {
>>>> int err = 0;
>>>> + int start_err = 0;
>>>> struct mmc_async_req *data = host->areq;
>>>>
>>>> /* Prepare a new request */
>>>> @@ -351,30 +353,23 @@ struct mmc_async_req *mmc_start_req(struct mmc_host
>>>> *host,
>>>> if (host->areq) {
>>>> mmc_wait_for_req_done(host, host->areq->mrq);
>>>> err = host->areq->err_check(host->card, host->areq);
>>>> - if (err) {
>>>> - /* post process the completed failed request */
>>>> - mmc_post_req(host, host->areq->mrq, 0);
>>>> - if (areq)
>>>> - /*
>>>> - * Cancel the new prepared request, because
>>>> - * it can't run until the failed
>>>> - * request has been properly handled.
>>>> - */
>>>> - mmc_post_req(host, areq->mrq, -EINVAL);
>>>> -
>>>> - host->areq = NULL;
>>>> - goto out;
>>>> - }
>>>> }
>>>>
>>>> - if (areq)
>>>> - __mmc_start_req(host, areq->mrq);
>>>> + if (!err&& areq)
>>>> + start_err = __mmc_start_req(host, areq->mrq);
>>>>
>>>> if (host->areq)
>>>> mmc_post_req(host, host->areq->mrq, 0);
>>>>
>>>> - host->areq = areq;
>>>> - out:
>>>> + if (err || start_err) {
>>>> + if (areq)
>>>> + /* The prepared request was not started, cancel it. */
>>>> + mmc_post_req(host, areq->mrq, -EINVAL);
>>>> + host->areq = NULL;
> There seems to be an issue when setting host->areq=NULL when __mmc_start_req
> fails. host->areq == NULL indicates there are no ongoing transfers.
> host->areq is used in block.c to check if there are pending requests.
>
> This seem to work:
> ...
> if (err || start_err) {
> if (areq)
> /* The prepared request was not started, cancel it. */
> mmc_post_req(host, areq->mrq, -EINVAL);
> }
>
> if (err)
> host->areq = NULL;
> else
> host->areq = areq;
> ...
>
> This issue will be addressed in version 2. How to resolve it is not decided
> yet.
It seems to work fine. But i didn't test yet.
Best Regards,
Jaehoon Chung
>
> Feel free to comment,
> Per
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in
> the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
