Hi Chris
On Thu, 15 Mar 2012, Chris Ball wrote:
> Hi Guennadi,
>
> On Fri, Mar 09 2012, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
> > Currently if a platform wants to implement a non-standard card-detection
> > method, it would need to call tmio_mmc_cd_wakeup(), which is an inline
> > function, calling mmc_detect_change(). For this the platform would have
> > to link mmc_core statically into the kernel, losing the ability to build
> > it as a module. This patch adds a callback to the sh_mobile_sdhi driver,
> > which eliminates this dependency.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Guennadi Liakhovetski <g.liakhovet...@gmx.de>
> > ---
> >
> > v2:
> >
> > 1. remove a call to tmio_mmc_cd_wakeup(), call mmc_detect_change()
> > directly instead
> > 2. document the new struct sh_mobile_sdhi_ops
> >
> > drivers/mmc/host/sh_mobile_sdhi.c | 11 ++++++++++-
> > include/linux/mmc/sh_mobile_sdhi.h | 11 ++++++++++-
> > 2 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/sh_mobile_sdhi.c
> > b/drivers/mmc/host/sh_mobile_sdhi.c
> > index dd288d6..8352054 100644
> > --- a/drivers/mmc/host/sh_mobile_sdhi.c
> > +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/sh_mobile_sdhi.c
> > @@ -100,6 +100,15 @@ static int sh_mobile_sdhi_write16_hook(struct
> > tmio_mmc_host *host, int addr)
> > return 0;
> > }
> >
> > +static void sh_mobile_sdhi_cd_wakeup(const struct platform_device *pdev)
> > +{
> > + mmc_detect_change(dev_get_drvdata(&pdev->dev), msecs_to_jiffies(100));
> > +}
> > +
> > +static const struct sh_mobile_sdhi_ops sdhi_ops = {
> > + .cd_wakeup = sh_mobile_sdhi_cd_wakeup,
> > +};
> > +
> > static int __devinit sh_mobile_sdhi_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > {
> > struct sh_mobile_sdhi *priv;
> > @@ -121,7 +130,7 @@ static int __devinit sh_mobile_sdhi_probe(struct
> > platform_device *pdev)
> > p->pdata = mmc_data;
> >
> > if (p->init) {
> > - ret = p->init(pdev);
> > + ret = p->init(pdev, &sdhi_ops);
> > if (ret)
> > goto einit;
> > }
>
> This patch doesn't apply because the "if (p->init)" conditional isn't in
> mmc-next. Maybe you're depending on a patch that I haven't taken yet?
Looks like you're missing this patch:
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.mmc/12070
But I also just noticed, that it's lacking an Sob... Bastian, could you,
please, re-send, so I can ack it?
Chris, we have also been discussing what to do about this my patch-series:
http://marc.info/?l=linux-sh&m=132882466624047&w=2
Please just take all mmc patches from that series - all except 5 and 6/10.
We'll deal with ARM patches after your push is in the mainline. No
breakage should occur.
Thanks
Guennadi
>
> > diff --git a/include/linux/mmc/sh_mobile_sdhi.h
> > b/include/linux/mmc/sh_mobile_sdhi.h
> > index 686b85b..e94e620 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/mmc/sh_mobile_sdhi.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/mmc/sh_mobile_sdhi.h
> > @@ -10,6 +10,14 @@ struct tmio_mmc_data;
> > #define SH_MOBILE_SDHI_IRQ_SDCARD "sdcard"
> > #define SH_MOBILE_SDHI_IRQ_SDIO "sdio"
> >
> > +/**
> > + * struct sh_mobile_sdhi_ops - SDHI driver callbacks
> > + * @cd_wakeup: trigger a card-detection run
> > + */
> > +struct sh_mobile_sdhi_ops {
> > + void (*cd_wakeup)(const struct platform_device *pdev);
> > +};
> > +
> > struct sh_mobile_sdhi_info {
> > int dma_slave_tx;
> > int dma_slave_rx;
> > @@ -22,7 +30,8 @@ struct sh_mobile_sdhi_info {
> > int (*get_cd)(struct platform_device *pdev);
> >
> > /* callbacks for board specific setup code */
> > - int (*init)(struct platform_device *pdev);
> > + int (*init)(struct platform_device *pdev,
> > + const struct sh_mobile_sdhi_ops *ops);
> > void (*cleanup)(struct platform_device *pdev);
> > };
>
> - Chris.
> --
> Chris Ball <c...@laptop.org> <http://printf.net/>
> One Laptop Per Child
>
---
Guennadi Liakhovetski, Ph.D.
Freelance Open-Source Software Developer
http://www.open-technology.de/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
