On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 08:58:00AM +0200, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
> On Wed, 28 Mar 2012, Paul Mundt wrote:
>
> > On Sat, Jan 28, 2012 at 07:36:24PM +0100, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
> > > Polling for card hotplug events is a better option than using SDHI native
> > > hotplug interrupt, because the latter option forces the controller to stay
> > > permanently powered up and enabled.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Guennadi Liakhovetski <g.liakhovet...@gmx.de>
> > > ---
> > >
> > > It is a kind of an RFC. We do in general prefer SDHI polling to SDHI
> > > native hotplug detection for the above reason, but there might well be
> > > other reasons, why this is not a good idea in this specific case. If
> > > there
> > > are such, I'd love to hear about them.
> > >
> > I've not heard any more about this one way or the other, so should I
> > assume you still want it applied? At least we can revert it if one of
> > these cases pops up, and in the interim it's always preferable to lean
> > towards better power management for a default.
>
> Yes, agree, since noone objected so far (as if I really expected dozens of
> people to pay attention to random RFC patches on the sh list;-)) let's
> apply it.
>
Applied.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
