Hi, On Tue, Jun 05 2012, Philip Rakity wrote: > On Jun 5, 2012, at 7:11 PM, Mark F. Brown wrote: > >> Hi Philip, >> >> Minor nitpicks: You should reuse SDHCI_QUIRK_MISSING_CAPS rather than >> adding SDHCI_QUIRK2_MISSING_CAPS2. The less quirks the better IMHO. > > I am not sure that this is a good idea. It breaks the existing code > for people using quirks > for capability register 1.
But it doesn't seem likely that someone would have a missing caps1 register and not have a missing caps2 register, right? (Probably the current users of the quirk aren't even on SD 3.0 devices, else someone would have yelled about this already.) So I think we could give the quirk reuse a try and see what happens. Thanks, - Chris. -- Chris Ball <c...@laptop.org> <http://printf.net/> One Laptop Per Child -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
