"S, Venkatraman" <svenk...@ti.com> writes: > On Sat, Jul 7, 2012 at 5:56 AM, Kevin Hilman <khil...@ti.com> wrote: >> Due to the way the driver core takes runtime PM references during >> probe, a driver's runtime PM callbacks may not be called until probe >> returns. During probe, drvdata is set to the 'host' pointer but if >> probe fails, drvdata is set to NULL. >> >> The runtime PM callbacks currently blindly dereference this host >> pointer, but if probe fails, and the runtime PM callbacks are called >> after probe returns, a NULL pointer dereference will result. >> > Pardon my ignorance, but why would runtime suspend be called for a > device whose probe has failed ? AFAIK, MMC stack wouldn't make the > _enable()/disable() calls, which call runtime PM APIs, unless the > probe is successful. Is there a stacktrace for the offending caller ?
First thing to note: there are several error conditions *after* pm_runtime_enable() and the first _get_sync() are called. So here's what can happen: The driver core does a _get_noresume() before calling the driver's probe, so the runtime PM usecount is already 1 when the driver is called. The _get_sync() in _probe enables the device and increases the usecount to 2. The _put_sync() at the end of ->probe() will decrease the usecount to 1, but since the usecount is still non-zero, the driver's callbacks are still not called. It's not until the driver core does its _put_sync (to balance the _get_noresume() that the usecount goes to zero and the driver's callbacks are called. When probe succeeds, this all works fine. However, if probe fails the host pointer is set to NULL, but the runtime PM callbacks are still called and attempt to dereference a NULL pointer. >> Fix this by simply checking to be sure the host pointer is non-NULL. >> >> Signed-off-by: Kevin Hilman <khil...@ti.com> >> --- >> Applies to v3.5-rc5. Fix is needed for v3.5-rc. >> > Can you please let me know which commit introduced this problem > in the first place ? There were not many changes in MMC PM code > in this merge window. I guess this problem is probably not a regression and has been around for some time. It has not been seen because probe has not failed. In using recent l-o master though, with Russell's dmaengine changes merged, probe is failing for me becasue it can't allocate a DMA channel, and then I'm seeing this problem. Kevin -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
