On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 3:43 PM, Chris Ball <c...@laptop.org> wrote:
> I think now is a good time to get the DT bindings right instead of
> propagating previous hacks into the DT, and this should be a pretty
> simple change -- it's not even a code change, since the code for
> automatically handling a vmmc-supply exists already.  Once we start
> accepting power-gpios properties we can't easily get rid of them later.
>
> If you don't have time to work on this, I guess I could accept the patch
> without the power-gpios handling included (since it'll still work with
> a DT that provides a vmmc-supply), but I don't want to take the patch
> as-is and legitimize the power-gpios binding.  Does that make sense?

Can't disagree with you, for not accepting it :)

Ok. For now i would just remove the power-gpios stuff and somebody from
ST will fix it with regulator stuff later.

--
viresh
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to