Balaji T K <balaj...@ti.com> wrote:

>On Friday 12 October 2012 08:44 PM, Daniel Mack wrote:
>> On 12.10.2012 16:56, Balaji T K wrote:
>>> On Friday 12 October 2012 07:59 PM, Daniel Mack wrote:
>>>> On 12.10.2012 12:58, Daniel Mack wrote:
>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/omap_hsmmc.c
>b/drivers/mmc/host/omap_hsmmc.c
>>>>> index 19ccb59..4b70823 100644
>>>>> --- a/drivers/mmc/host/omap_hsmmc.c
>>>>> +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/omap_hsmmc.c
>>>>> @@ -1728,6 +1728,7 @@ static int __devinit omap_hsmmc_probe(struct
>platform_device *pdev)
>>>>>                           const u16 *offsetp = match->data;
>>>>>                           pdata->reg_offset = *offsetp;
>>>>>                   }
>>>>> +         pdev->dev.platform_data = pdata;
>>>>>           }
>>>>>
>>>>>           if (pdata == NULL) {
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> FWIW, this is the Oops I see without this patch:
>>> Hi,
>>> Shouldn't pdev->dev.platform_data be set to NULL on _remove ?
>>
>> Why?
>
>To make sure on second insmod it is NULL, When built as module,
>So that of_get_hsmmc_pdata is called to create pdata.

Actually the driver should *never* modify the value of dev->platform_data. 
Ever. Make a copy instead.

g.

-- 
Grant Likely, P.Eng.
Secret Lab Technologies Ltd.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to