> I think that we're miss-communicating a bit here. What I'm trying to say > is that trying to extend the dw_mmc driver to support sunxi is a bad > idea because the sunxi hardware is quite different. And that the > sunxi hardware having autostop allows the existing sunxi-mci driver to > be much simpler then the dw-mmc driver.
> IOW the much simpler driver already exists and it is the sunxi-mci > driver. Ah! Ok. Now I get it. Well then. I'll try to incorporate all the changes within this endless thread until I can get together a patchset v2 I can hand in. Now that the lectures have ended for this semester I won't be too tired for straight thinking on daily basis and will be able to create such a patchset. And please excuse my contentless answers onto the last few questions but I really wasn't myself - so to say - at this time (half asleep) -david
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
