On 01/15/2014 11:53 AM, Mike Turquette wrote:
Quoting zhangfei (2014-01-14 17:40:25)
Dear Mike
On 01/15/2014 04:17 AM, Mike Turquette wrote:
Quoting Zhangfei Gao (2014-01-13 01:14:28)
Suggest by Arnd: abstract mmc tuning as clock behavior,
also because different soc have different tuning method and registers.
hi3620_mmc_clks is added to handle mmc clock specifically on hi3620.
Signed-off-by: Zhangfei Gao <zhangfei....@linaro.org>
Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann <a...@arndb.de>
Acked-by: Jaehoon Chung <jh80.ch...@samsung.com>
Patch looks good to me with one exception. I do not have
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/hisilicon/hisilicon.txt in the
clk-next branch. Is there a stable branch I can pull in as a dependency?
Mach-hisi just have been uploaeded.
Have tried next-20140114, the patch can be applied successfully.
While v3.13-rc8 still can not.
Is this fine?
Can you give me a link to the branch that introduces
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/hisilicon/hisilicon.txt?
I guess the patch introducing it is going through arm-soc. Is this going
in for 3.14? If so then perhaps the clk tree and the arm-soc tree can
share a stable branch that introduces it.
Regards,
Mike
Some patches are merged into arm-soc, and others are in clk tree.
If sharing a stable branch between arm-soc and clk tree, it only means
that we need to revert all commits that are in arm-soc and clk tree.
I think it's too complex.
How about split the patch? The patch on document should enter in arm-soc.
Regards
Haojian
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
