Le 14/08/2014 13:46, Ulf Hansson a écrit :
> On 13 August 2014 11:20, Grégory Soutadé <gsout...@neotion.com> wrote:
>> Le 13/08/2014 10:36, Ulf Hansson a écrit :
>>> On 17 July 2014 16:57, Grégory Soutadé <gsout...@neotion.com> wrote:
>>>> Create MMC general purpose partitions only if
>>>> EXT_CSD_PARTITION_SETTING_COMPLETED bit is set.
>>>> Some tools may set general purpose partition size(s) but fail or stop
>>>> without finalize.
>>>> Another case is to set invalid partition size(s).
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Grégory Soutadé <gsout...@neotion.com>
>>>> ---
>>>> drivers/mmc/core/mmc.c | 15 +++++++++++----
>>>> include/linux/mmc/mmc.h | 2 ++
>>>> 2 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>>>
>>>> From commit b6603fe574af289dbe9eb9fb4c540bca04f5a053 in master linux tree.
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/core/mmc.c b/drivers/mmc/core/mmc.c
>>>> index 793c6f7..b9fe211 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/mmc/core/mmc.c
>>>> +++ b/drivers/mmc/core/mmc.c
>>>> @@ -471,10 +471,17 @@ static int mmc_read_ext_csd(struct mmc_card *card,
>>>> u8 *ext_csd)
>>>> ext_csd[EXT_CSD_GP_SIZE_MULT + idx * 3];
>>>> part_size *= (size_t)(hc_erase_grp_sz *
>>>> hc_wp_grp_sz);
>>>> - mmc_part_add(card, part_size << 19,
>>>> - EXT_CSD_PART_CONFIG_ACC_GP0 + idx,
>>>> - "gp%d", idx, false,
>>>> - MMC_BLK_DATA_AREA_GP);
>>>> + if
>>>> (ext_csd[EXT_CSD_PARTITION_SETTING_COMPLETED] &
>>>> + EXT_CSD_PART_SETTING_COMPLETED) {
>>>
>>> Some minor comments here.
>>>
>>> I think you could move this if statement up and into the previous "if"
>>> where we check for "ext_csd[EXT_CSD_PARTITION_SUPPORT] &
>>> EXT_CSD_PART_SUPPORT_PART_EN".
>>>
>>> Additionally, please run checkpatch.
>>>
>>> Kind regards
>>> Uffe
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>> I didn't put the if statement above to warn user in case of bad partitioning.
>> I don't want the kernel to silently ignore this error.
>
> Fair enough.
>
> Still I am wondering whether hc_erase_grp_sz, hc_wp_grp_sz and
> enhanced_area_en should be updated if
> EXT_CSD_PARTITION_SETTING_COMPLETED isn't set. That's the case in
> your patch.I was focused on partitions and I didn't pay attention on enhanced area. JEDEC says that partitioning implies : * Configure general purpose partitions attributes and sizes * Configure enhanced user area offset, attributes and size and finally set EXT_CSD_PARTITION_SETTING_COMPLETED. Thus these two parts must checks for setting completed before computing values. Plus, "enhanced_area_en" attribute is set whether or not there is an enhanced area defined. I looked at the code, and the only usage of it is to set EXT_CSD_ERASE_GROUP_DEF and compute erase size again. I suggest using "partition_setting_completed" identifier which is common to the two functions and requires EXT_CSD_ERASE_GROUP_DEF to be set. If you're ok with that, I'll submit another patch. Best regards Grégory Soutadé > >> >> checkpatch has been run before sending this patch, I know there are two lines >> with two extra characters, but names used here are quite long. I hope it will >> not block upstream inclusion. > > The mmc_read_ext_csd() is not one of the nicest piece of code, but for > sure we should not move on making it worse. If you need to move code > into separate function to prevent checkpatch warnings, please do so. > > Kind regards > Uffe >
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
