>From 21266249bbbaf9407c1e88cd5950e06ac88aeebf Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Fu Zhonghui <zhonghui...@linux.intel.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Aug 2014 10:48:14 +0800
Subject: [PATCH] mmc: core: sdio: Fix unconditional wake_up_process() on sdio
thread
781e989cf59 ("mmc: sdhci: convert to new SDIO IRQ handling") and
bf3b5ec66bd ("mmc: sdio_irq: rework sdio irq handling") disabled
the use of our own custom threaded IRQ handler, but left in an
unconditional wake_up_process() on that handler at resume-time.
Link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=80151
In addition, the check for MMC_CAP_SDIO_IRQ capability is added
before enable sdio IRQ.
Signed-off-by: Jaehoon Chung <jh80.ch...@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Ball <ch...@printf.net>
Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hans...@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Fu Zhonghui <zhonghui...@linux.intel.com>
---
drivers/mmc/core/sdio.c | 12 ++++++++++--
drivers/mmc/core/sdio_irq.c | 4 ++--
2 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/mmc/core/sdio.c b/drivers/mmc/core/sdio.c
index e636d9e..3fc40a7 100644
--- a/drivers/mmc/core/sdio.c
+++ b/drivers/mmc/core/sdio.c
@@ -992,8 +992,16 @@ static int mmc_sdio_resume(struct mmc_host *host)
}
}
- if (!err && host->sdio_irqs)
- wake_up_process(host->sdio_irq_thread);
+ if (!err && host->sdio_irqs) {
+ if (!(host->caps2 & MMC_CAP2_SDIO_IRQ_NOTHREAD)) {
+ wake_up_process(host->sdio_irq_thread);
+ } else if (host->caps & MMC_CAP_SDIO_IRQ) {
+ mmc_host_clk_hold(host);
+ host->ops->enable_sdio_irq(host, 1);
+ mmc_host_clk_release(host);
+ }
+ }
+
mmc_release_host(host);
host->pm_flags &= ~MMC_PM_KEEP_POWER;
diff --git a/drivers/mmc/core/sdio_irq.c b/drivers/mmc/core/sdio_irq.c
index 5cc13c8..696eca4 100644
--- a/drivers/mmc/core/sdio_irq.c
+++ b/drivers/mmc/core/sdio_irq.c
@@ -208,7 +208,7 @@ static int sdio_card_irq_get(struct mmc_card *card)
host->sdio_irqs--;
return err;
}
- } else {
+ } else if (host->caps & MMC_CAP_SDIO_IRQ) {
mmc_host_clk_hold(host);
host->ops->enable_sdio_irq(host, 1);
mmc_host_clk_release(host);
@@ -229,7 +229,7 @@ static int sdio_card_irq_put(struct mmc_card *card)
if (!(host->caps2 & MMC_CAP2_SDIO_IRQ_NOTHREAD)) {
atomic_set(&host->sdio_irq_thread_abort, 1);
kthread_stop(host->sdio_irq_thread);
- } else {
+ } else if (host->caps & MMC_CAP_SDIO_IRQ) {
mmc_host_clk_hold(host);
host->ops->enable_sdio_irq(host, 0);
mmc_host_clk_release(host);
-- 1.7.1
On 2014/8/12 18:23, Ulf Hansson wrote:
> On 11 August 2014 07:49, Fu, Zhonghui <zhonghui...@linux.intel.com> wrote:
>> From 6cee984e1d76ba0a3320430f8cf4318ab65fcf06 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
>> From: Fu Zhonghui <zhonghui...@linux.intel.com>
>> Date: Tue, 5 Aug 2014 12:44:38 +0800
>> Subject: [PATCH] mmc: core: sdio: Fix unconditional wake_up_process() on
>> sdio thread
>>
>> 781e989cf59 ("mmc: sdhci: convert to new SDIO IRQ handling") and
>> bf3b5ec66bd ("mmc: sdio_irq: rework sdio irq handling") disabled
>> the use of our own custom threaded IRQ handler, but left in an
>> unconditional wake_up_process() on that handler at resume-time.
>> Link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=80151
>>
>> In addition, the check for MMC_CAP_SDIO_IRQ capability is added
>> before enable sdio IRQ.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Jaehoon Chung <jh80.ch...@samsung.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Chris Ball <ch...@printf.net>
>> Signed-off-by: Fu Zhonghui <zhonghui...@linux.intel.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/mmc/core/sdio.c | 14 ++++++++++++--
>> drivers/mmc/core/sdio_irq.c | 4 ++--
>> 2 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/core/sdio.c b/drivers/mmc/core/sdio.c
>> index e636d9e..e04a540 100644
>> --- a/drivers/mmc/core/sdio.c
>> +++ b/drivers/mmc/core/sdio.c
>> @@ -992,8 +992,18 @@ static int mmc_sdio_resume(struct mmc_host *host)
>> }
>> }
>>
>> - if (!err && host->sdio_irqs)
>> - wake_up_process(host->sdio_irq_thread);
>> + if (!err && host->sdio_irqs) {
>> + if (!(host->caps2 & MMC_CAP2_SDIO_IRQ_NOTHREAD)) {
>> + wake_up_process(host->sdio_irq_thread);
>> + } else if (host->caps & MMC_CAP_SDIO_IRQ) {
>> + mmc_release_host(host);
> Why mmc_release_host() and the corresponding mmc_claim_host() below?
> Those shouldn't be needed I think.
You are right. These two functions shouldn't be invoked here. I made a new
patch as above.
Thanks,
Zhonghui
>
>
>> + mmc_host_clk_hold(host);
>> + host->ops->enable_sdio_irq(host, 1);
>> + mmc_host_clk_release(host);
>> + mmc_claim_host(host);
>> + }
>> + }
>> +
>> mmc_release_host(host);
>>
>> host->pm_flags &= ~MMC_PM_KEEP_POWER;
>> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/core/sdio_irq.c b/drivers/mmc/core/sdio_irq.c
>> index 5cc13c8..696eca4 100644
>> --- a/drivers/mmc/core/sdio_irq.c
>> +++ b/drivers/mmc/core/sdio_irq.c
>> @@ -208,7 +208,7 @@ static int sdio_card_irq_get(struct mmc_card *card)
>> host->sdio_irqs--;
>> return err;
>> }
>> - } else {
>> + } else if (host->caps & MMC_CAP_SDIO_IRQ) {
>> mmc_host_clk_hold(host);
>> host->ops->enable_sdio_irq(host, 1);
>> mmc_host_clk_release(host);
>> @@ -229,7 +229,7 @@ static int sdio_card_irq_put(struct mmc_card *card)
>> if (!(host->caps2 & MMC_CAP2_SDIO_IRQ_NOTHREAD)) {
>> atomic_set(&host->sdio_irq_thread_abort, 1);
>> kthread_stop(host->sdio_irq_thread);
>> - } else {
>> + } else if (host->caps & MMC_CAP_SDIO_IRQ) {
>> mmc_host_clk_hold(host);
>> host->ops->enable_sdio_irq(host, 0);
>> mmc_host_clk_release(host);
>> -- 1.7.1
>>
> Thanks for working on this!
>
> Kind regards
> Uffe
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
