I will format a patch based on your diff file firstly. I will test this on my side, If any issue, like dma issue or performance issue, I will add some modification. Then I will send the patch for review, and you can test the patch on your platform.
Best Regards Haibo Chen > -----Original Message----- > From: Jiri Slaby [mailto:jsl...@suse.cz] > Sent: Thursday, August 06, 2015 5:07 PM > To: Chen Haibo-B51421; Ulf Hansson > Cc: linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org; Linux kernel mailing list > Subject: Re: [RFC] sdhci: fix DMA leaks [was: [SHDCI] Heavy (thousands) > DMA leaks] > > On 08/06/2015, 09:42 AM, Chen Bough wrote: > > I read your attached log and patch, yes, dma memory leak will happen > > when more than one pre_request execute. The method of ++next->cookie > > is not good, your patch seems good, but I still need some time to test > > the patch, because you unmap the dma in sdhci_finish_data rather than > the sdhci_post_req. > > Hi, > > yes, this is not correct. We can perhaps differentiate according to the > COOKIE value. Should I fix it or are you going to prepare a patch based > on my RFC? > > thanks, > -- > js > suse labs N�����r��y����b�X��ǧv�^�){.n�+����{��g"��^n�r���z���h�����&�� �G���h�(�階�ݢj"���m������z�ޖ���f���h���~�m�
