On Tue, Apr 2, 2024 at 10:03 AM zhang warden <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> It seems that you try to remove the disabled module by the kip replace.
> However, changing the code of sys call may introduce some unnecessary changes
> to non-livepatch module.
Could you please explain why klp_free_patch_finish() will impact the
non-livepatch module ?
> Is that really a safe way to do so?
Could you pls elaborate how you practice the kpatch replace mode in your
production environment? Have you notice the commit df1e98f2c74
("kpatch: rmmod module of the same name before loading a module") in
the kpatch userspace tool that tries to workaround this issue ?
BTW, why do you think it is unsafe ?
--
Regards
Yafang
