On Mon, 19 Jan 2004, James B. Hiller wrote:

> Hi.
> 
> > > Ref my previous email of a few minutes ago:  a couple other factoids:
> > > 
> > > a.  Am using command.com, io.sys, msdos.sys from Win95
> 
> [snip simile]
> 
> Nice simile :-)
> 
> > Let me whisper in your ear:
> >              ALL WINDOWS "MSDOS" stuff is NOT MSDOS!!! 
> 
> Understood.  But I was always under the impression that the DOS
> environment from Win95 was still "whole", and that it's not unless
> you're in the NT/2000 domain that what you explain is an issue.
> 
> And, aside from that, been using this componentry with DOSEMU
> (albeit only from an hdimage perspective) since like 1996.
> > 
> > WINDOWS "DOS" is a kind of emulator that requires MS-Windows be running.
> > The proof is by trying to run a regular MSDOS protected mode program. 
> > (It won't run under an emulator.)
> 
> If this is an issue here, methinks Mr Oldeman may have commented
> thusly already?
> 
> But I do have MS-DOS 6.22 disks around if needs be.

I also have a binary download of dosemu 1.2 with msdos 6.22 if need be.  
ftp://solarflow.dyndns.org/pub


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-msdos" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to