I had to do this, I finally just made stand alone kernals.
the old modules must be removed I found out later way way down in the
documentation
Good luck, I have tried both and if you compile in what you use, I think the
size will not be any greater than the modules in useplus kernal, and I seem to
see a slight improvement in speed on my old machine, takes longer to load than
execute.
On Fri, 18 Dec 1998 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> To Whom,
>
> Why sooooooooo m-a-n-y cliffhangers. Why soooooooo m-u-c-h rope to do as
> we please and as the documentation will allow (granted, plenty of room
> is how it should be and is). Then, when it r-e-a-l-l-y counts...
> nothing!
>
> I've been at this Linux 2.0.30 by Red Hat with version 4.2 long enough
> to know that I keep coming back around to the same spot I finished
> leaving with the prior project. A brick wall! It's not the OS that I'm
> so critical about, it's the lack of direction and REAL detailed go at it
> sort of documentation that allows beginning and definitely finishing
> results!
>
> I went as far as I could with any and everything possibly related to the
> server processes to enable the local hosts to gateway, ip_forward, share
> resources, and blah, blah, blah. Many of it still not finished because
> the lack of real finished documentation. Finally, the moment came when I
> knew that a major step needed to be put in motion... compiling the
> kernel. Ha, Ha, Huh!!!!!!!!!
>
> I compiled the kernel with the intention to allow myself the ability to
> modular'ize all those things that change every so often or allow room
> for growth without recompiling the kernel and making the kernel
> unnecessarily large. No such luck! I read all the documents, printed
> necessary booklet documentation to avoid rushing back and forth to view
> this and that, physically traced every detail, avoided every pitfall,
> followed every detail output to the screens, tried to divide and conquer
> and crashed!
>
> Physically, it is aggravating and emotionally draining to adhere with
> experience, intelligence, and a lot of creativity to the steps provided
> in the software packages. In my short time while working with Linux (I
> emphasize Linux... not users), I'm convinced that it is far superior
> then any other OS. It's just a wee bit short of an enormous amount of
> information to carry over the necessary projects to the operating, fully
> functioning, finishing point.
>
> *************************************************************************
>
> Signed,
> Concerned
>
> P.'S. Detailed Documentation(s) and Sample(s) are more than welcome!
>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-net" in
> the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
The Net Lab year 2000 and beyond Internet Education is Science
http://www.netlab.org
WA0JRJ - Jerry
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-net" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
