>> I've no idea what you're getting at above. Good? Bad? I've been using
>> tulip-based boards for over a year now (in >30 boxes) and haven't had any
>> problems.
>
> The closest to a problem I've ever had with the numerous Tulip (and
>Tulip-compatible) network cards I've used is that they generally don't work
>when you overclock your PCI bus. But stick to the normal 33Mhz, use the
>latest version of the driver, and you'll be quite happy.
Well, performance isn't an issue for me. Stability and reliability are.
So, I guess I'm covered.
On this note, though.... Anyone have any experience with the dual/quad
tulip boards (like the ones from Adaptec, for instance)?
Regards,
Kevin
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-net" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
