Glenn,
There you go! If it works, then go for it. That makes me remember a time I tried
that on a game and it worked just fine. You don't need to worry about the
default if you can have the libc 5.x in the library directory without it
interfering with the other files.
Thanks Juan!
> Date: Fri, 22 Jan 1999 14:32:57 -0200
> From: Juan Carlos Castro y Castro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Organization: PC-Shop ISP
>
> But you can always install the missing libc version and have libc6 as the
> default... can't you? I mean, libc.so pointing to libc.so.6 but with a valid
> libc.so.5 present. If I'm not wrong StarOffice 4 works well this way.
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > If you are installing StarOffice 4.x on a libc 6.x Linux machine, then
> > it is impossible. Only StarOffice 5.x will work on a libc 6.x Linux
> > machine. In other words, StarOffice 4.x will only work on machines using
> > Red Hat 5.1 and less.
> >
> > glenn masters wrote:
> >
> > > Anyone use Star Office 4.0 as a desktop ?
> > >
> > > I followed the instructions in Linux 4th Edition to install Star
> > > Office4..0 and
> > > after entering the setup command I get an Installation splash screen
> > > and
> > > an error saying "syntax error at line one " and after pressing OK ,
> > > get
> > > "Scripting Error" at which point I can go no further . Any suggestions
*************************************************************************
Signed,
Grateful to Help
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-net" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
