> So does it also mean that the patch does not work on the PCs of type PC01? > Or does it simply mean there are currently no "eth0:SMP simultaneous > entry > of an interrupt handler" on that PCs??? The printk is more related to how your CPUs are numbered at boot than the bug. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-net" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Re: SMP+Tulip lockup, 2.0.36pre15, help request... Patrick J. LoPresti
- Re: SMP+Tulip lockup, 2.0.36pre15, help requested Donald Becker
- Re: SMP+Tulip lockup, 2.0.36pre15, help request... Alan Cox
- Re: SMP+Tulip lockup, 2.0.36pre15, help req... Donald Becker
- SMP+eepro lockup, 2.0.35, help requested Catherine Charbonnier
- Re: SMP+eepro lockup, 2.0.35, help requ... Alan Cox
- Re: SMP+eepro lockup, 2.0.35, help ... Catherine Charbonnier
- Re: SMP+Tulip lockup, 2.0.36pr... Alan Cox
- Re: SMP+Tulip lockup, 2.0.36pre15, help requested G.W. Wettstein