Hi,
I wonder if I'm the only one seeing this, in the last couple of days I've
gotten a lot of malformed messages like the one included.
They all have a scewed up "Received by vger" line, in all cases it looks
as if \n\n instead of \n\t had been used to wrap a too long line.
--
Henrik Olsen, Dawn Solutions I/S URL=http://www.iaeste.dk/~henrik/
A Pentium is a terrible thing to waste, http://www.mersenne.org/prime.htm
---------- Forwarded message ----------
Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from localhost (root@localhost [127.0.0.1])
by cyril.iaeste.dk (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id QAA25123
for <henrik@localhost>; Tue, 6 Apr 1999 16:02:34 +0200
Date: Tue, 6 Apr 1999 16:02:34 +0200
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from newby.iaeste.dtu.dk
by fetchmail-4.5.8 POP3
for <henrik/localhost> (single-drop); Tue, 06 Apr 1999 16:02:34 CEST
Received: from SpoolDir by DK-DTU-IAESTE-NEWBY (Mercury 1.43); 6 Apr 99 15:48:30 +0100
Received: from phister.iaeste.dtu.dk (130.225.90.122) by iaeste.dk (Mercury 1.43) with
ESMTP;
6 Apr 99 15:47:20 +0100
Received: from ifi.uio.no ([EMAIL PROTECTED] [129.240.64.2])
by phister.iaeste.dtu.dk (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id PAA07475
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue, 6 Apr 1999 15:47:20 +0200
Received: from vger.rutgers.edu (vger.rutgers.edu [128.6.190.2])
by ifi.uio.no (8.8.8/8.8.7/ifi0.2) with ESMTP id PAA05018;
Tue, 6 Apr 1999 15:47:03 +0200 (MET DST)
Received: by vger.rutgers.edu via listexpand id <218197-25725>; Tue,
6 Apr 1999 09:27:07 -0400
Received: by vger.rutgers.edu id <185660-25726>; Tue, 6 Apr 1999 09:22:05 -0400
Received: from et-gw.etinc.com ([207.252.1.2]:1907 "EHLO etinc.com" ident:
"NO-IDENT-SERVICE[2]") by vger.rutgers.edu with ESMTP id <168613-25725>; Tue, 6 Apr 1
999 09:11:24 -0400
Received: from workstation.etinc.com (port38.netsvr1.cst.vastnet.net [207.252.73.38])
by etinc.com (8.8.8/8.6.9) with SMTP id JAA10046; Tue, 6 Apr 1999 09:21:56 -0400 (EDT)
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Pro Version 4.0
Date: Tue, 06 Apr 1999 21:21:43 -0400
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Alan Cox), [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: Dennis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: traffic shaper
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Orcpt: rfc822;linux-net-outgoing
At 01:27 PM 4/6/99 +0100, Alan Cox wrote:
>> nearly as much as i thought it would. tried running it at 800kpbs, and it
>> ended up sending more like 1900 kpbs outbound, all http traffic. there's
>
>As the documentation says its only really useful up to about 256Kbits.
>
>The shaper algorithm is relatively crude
We're a few days from having our bandwidth manager ported to linux. We'll be
seeking guinea pigs shortly :-)
Dennis
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
http://www.etinc.com
T1/T3 boards for FreeBSD and Linux
Bandwidth Management for FreeBSD and BSD/OS
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-net" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-net" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
