-=> #arp -i eth1 -s 172.16.17.99 00:00:21:60:66:2f pub i connected several networks using proxyarp in this way arp -i eth1 -Ds ip_on_eth0 eth1 pub route add -host ip_on_eth0 eth0 arp -i eth0 -Ds ip_on_eth1 eth0 pub route add -host ip_on_eth1 eth1 -=> Is Linux supposed to proxy arp requests under this configuration ? If so, -=>what I'm doing wrong ? Does this configuration work fine with 2.2.5 ? what I propose works both on 2.0.36 and 2.2.5 what you did incorrectly is that either you didn't set up routes, either didn't add public arp entries properly. With respect, Domas Mituzas aka dammit - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-net" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Why does arp on 2.2.5 return "SIOCSARP: Operation not... dave
- Re: Why does arp on 2.2.5 return "SIOCSARP: Oper... dave
- Re: Why does arp on 2.2.5 return "SIOCSARP: Oper... dave
- Proxy Arp with 2.0.36 Rodrigo Ormonde
- Re: Why does arp on 2.2.5 return "SIOCSA... Domas Mituzas
- Re: Why does arp on 2.2.5 return "SIOCSARP: Oper... Bernd Eckenfels
- Re: Why does arp on 2.2.5 return "SIOCSARP: ... dave
- Re: Why does arp on 2.2.5 return "SIOCSA... dave
- Re: Why does arp on 2.2.5 return "SI... Bernd Eckenfels
- Re: Why does arp on 2.2.5 return &qu... dave
- Re: Why does arp on 2.2.5 return... Bernd Eckenfels
- Re: Why does arp on 2.2.5 re... dave
- Re: Why does arp on 2.2.5 re... Bernd Eckenfels
- Re: Why does arp on 2.2.5 return "SIOCSA... Taral
