Re: tulip.c (maybe) bug???

[Alan Cox]

> trying to use the private ioctl, but it seems to me that there is
> a problem with the pointer address. Should this patch solve the
> problem?

The original code is correct

> -     u16 *data = (u16 *)&rq->ifr_data;
> +     u16 *data = (u16 *)rq->ifr_data;

The patch breaks the driver. You are using rq->ifr_data as a pointer, it
is not, it is the data instance

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-net" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]