> I'm not sure what the documentation means about not preserving
> directory structure. I can only presume that it means that the result
> of `ls -U' isn't guaranteed to be preserved. Every other aspect of the
> directory structure appears to be preserved, including hard link
> relationships (which I'm fairly sure that tar/cpio won't preserve).
tar actually seems to do that preservation, at least GNU tar 1.12 does.
--
Kevin L. Mitchell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
------------------------- -. .---- --.. ..- -..- --------------------------
http://web.mit.edu/klmitch/www/ (PGP keys availiable from here)
RSA AE87D37D/1024: DE EA 1E 99 3F 2B F9 23 A0 D8 05 E0 6F BA B9 D2
DSS ED0DB34E/1024: D9BF 0E74 FDCB 43F5 C597 878F 9455 EC24 ED0D B34E
DH 2A2C31D4/2048: 1A77 4BA5 9E32 14AE 87DA 9FEC 7106 FC62 2A2C 31D4
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-net" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
