Hello! > I can't see why we'd have to ignore RSTs in an established state. > Care to give an example? Think a bit why transient ICMP errors are ignored in established state. If firewalls will generate RSTs their status becomes equal to ICMP transient errors. Alexey - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-net" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- ICMP dest-unreach in SYN_* states of TCP Taral
- Re: ICMP dest-unreach in SYN_* states of TCP kuznet
- Re: ICMP dest-unreach in SYN_* states of TCP Jamie Lokier
- Re: ICMP dest-unreach in SYN_* states of TCP kuznet
- Re: ICMP dest-unreach in SYN_* states of TCP Jamie Lokier
- Re: ICMP dest-unreach in SYN_* states o... kuznet
- Re: ICMP dest-unreach in SYN_* stat... Taral
- Re: ICMP dest-unreach in SYN_* ... kuznet
- Re: ICMP dest-unreach in SYN_* ... Jamie Lokier
- Re: ICMP dest-unreach in SYN_* ... kuznet
- Re: ICMP dest-unreach in SYN_* ... Jamie Lokier
- Re: ICMP dest-unreach in SYN_* ... kuznet
- Re: ICMP dest-unreach in SYN_* ... Jamie Lokier
- Re: ICMP dest-unreach in SYN_* ... Taral
- Re: ICMP dest-unreach in SYN_* ... Jamie Lokier
- Re: ICMP dest-unreach in SYN_* ... kuznet
