On Wed, Jul 14, 1999 at 08:58:24PM -0600, Trenton D. Adams wrote:
> Is Masquerading = NAT?  This is what it sounds like to me.  I have read the
> masquerade howto, but it didn't work!  I will try it again though.
> 

Masquerading != NAT  (it is a little brother to the more general NAT)

NAT can do many-to-many address translation.

Masquerading can only do one-to-many address translation.
(i.e. hiding a private subnet behind a masquerading firewall makes the
whole subnet appear to the internet as if there is only one machine
using lots of high ports).

 -Erik

--
Erik B. Andersen   Web:    http://www.xmission.com/~andersen/ 
                   email:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--This message was written using 73% post-consumer electrons--
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-net" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to