Mircea Ciocan wrote: > AFAIK, your assertion is correct, but take care if you do selective > delete ( based on sender for example), you have to re-issue the STAT > command. That's good enough for me. In my application, I either delete all messages or don't delete any, and there's only one STAT/RETR/DELE cycle per connection. Thanks! > Juan Carlos Castro y Castro wrote: > > > > If the STAT command tells me there are N messages available, can I > > safely assume I can issue RETR 1, RETR 2,... RETR <N> commands? Or is it > > possible that the sequence numbers are not 1 thru N?
begin:vcard n:Castro;Juan tel;work:540-9100 Ramal 46 x-mozilla-html:FALSE url:http://www.appi.com.br/jcastro org:APPI Inform�tica;Desenvolvimento adr:;;Av. Ataulfo de Paiva, 135/1410 - Leblon;Rio de Janeiro;RJ;22499-900;Brasil version:2.1 email;internet:[EMAIL PROTECTED] title:Consultor note;quoted-printable:One man alone cannot fight the future. USE LINUX!=0D=0A=0D=0A -- The X Racer=0D=0A=0D=0APGP Key ID 0xAAE4050C=0D=0A fn:Juan Carlos Castro y Castro end:vcard
