On Wed, Jul 28, 1999 at 04:47:46PM +0200, Glynn Clements wrote:
> > Two things. It should not be sorted in to files but sent as local?.* to
> > a loghost using syslog.
> 
> Then have the filter program use 'logger' to re-log the messages.
> 
> > And what happens if the program listening on the
> > other end of the fifo dies?
> 
> Ensure that it gets re-started.

This is a very nasty solution, a potential problem could very well be
that the kernel writes to the fifo and fills the buffer before the
program kan read it (or (re)start and read it). Wouldn't that make 
the write block? Generally I'm not too fond of the kernel beeing 
dependant on a perticular program running. There must be another 
way of doing it!


-- 
        Christoffer

Three things are certain: Death, taxes, and lost data.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-net" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to