Bert,
> On Sat, 13 Nov 1999 20:16:10 -0800 (PST), Mr. James W. Laferriere wrote:
> >
> > Hello Bert, Why not use scp ? It will log the transfers
> > and you can copy whole recusive directories & preserve the
> > time & permission stamps also . Just a thought . JimL
>
> scp is fine, I do use it from home at my linux-box. the problems is,
> that I/we use Windows when on tour. So do you know of an Windows
> implementation of scp?
Read about port forwarding in your ssh implementation. Basically, you
indicate what local port will be redirected through the encrypted
ssh pipe to the remote ftp destination. Then, the user connects
with any FTP client to localhost (aka 127.0.0.1). It works very well
when you want secure ftp to one site; it's messier if you need to
regularly connect to multiple ftp sites. Also, it requires ssh
login to the site *first*, and then ftp use.
I, too, would like a Win32 scp.
En paz,
Steve
--
The only safe choice: Write e-mail as if it's public. Cuz it could be.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-net" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
