At 10:07 PM 2/28/00 +0000, you wrote: >> Real overloads take care of themselves in the form of ring overruns...you >> can tune the size of the rings in most cases as well....causing overloads >> by not processing the data properly is not a "win" > >Demonstrably not the case. You can stall a PC with a hardware packet >generator just on IRQ load at 100Mbit, let alone Gbit A machine's capacity is what it can process WITHOUT dropping packets. If you have to drop them to stop it from stalling then you need a faster machine. Momentary overruns can are handled gracefully, continuous overruns require better hardware. DB - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-net" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Re: Performance Tests Cisco 2514 and Pentium 166... Dennis
- Re: Performance Tests Cisco 2514 and Pentium 166... Nick Bastin
- Re: Performance Tests Cisco 2514 and Pentium 166... Christopher E. Brown
- Re: Performance Tests Cisco 2514 and Pentium 166... Dan Hollis
- Re: Performance Tests Cisco 2514 and Pentium 166... Jakob �stergaard
- Re: Performance Tests Cisco 2514 and Pentium 166... Christopher E. Brown
- Re: Performance Tests Cisco 2514 and Pentium 166... Dennis
- Re: Performance Tests Cisco 2514 and Pentium 166... Alan Cox
- Re: Performance Tests Cisco 2514 and Pentium 166... Dennis
- Re: Performance Tests Cisco 2514 and Pentium 166... Alan Cox
- Re: Performance Tests Cisco 2514 and Pentium 166... Dennis
- Re: Performance Tests Cisco 2514 and Pentium 166... Alan Cox
- Re: Performance Tests Cisco 2514 and Pentium 166/400 Dennis
