> > Seriously, though. Statefulness is the enemy of performance an > > realiability. > > That is incorrect. It is the enemy of KISS to a certain degree though. He is right about the performance and reliably as well as forgetting scaling. There are things you cannot do without firewall state, but being able to avoid them is generally the best answer And if you cant avoid them, well make sure your failover is good - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-net" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Can a linux firewall protect against SYN flooding (an... Dr. Michael Weller
- Re: Can a linux firewall protect against SYN flo... Alan Cox
- Re: Can a linux firewall protect against SYN flo... Lars Marowsky-Bree
- Re: Can a linux firewall protect against SYN... Catalin BOIE
- Re: Can a linux firewall protect against... Steve Dodd
- Re: Can a linux firewall protect aga... Christopher E. Brown
- Re: Can a linux firewall prote... Lars Marowsky-Bree
- Re: Can a linux firewall p... Gregory Maxwell
- Re: Can a linux firew... Lars Marowsky-Bree
- Re: Can a linux firew... Alan Cox
- Re: Can a linux firew... Gregory Maxwell
- Re: Can a linux fire... Lars Marowsky-Bree
- Re: Can a linux firewa... Christopher E. Brown
- Re: Can a linux firewa... Stephen Satchell
- Re: Can a linux firewa... Gregory Maxwell
- Re: Can a linux firewall pr... Steve Dodd
- Re: Can a linux firewal... Michael H. Warfield
- Re: Can a linux firewal... Gregory Maxwell
- Re: Can a linux firewal... Michael H. Warfield
- Re: Can a linux firewal... Gregory Maxwell
